Skip to main content
European Radiology Experimental
Download PDF
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Intraindividual reproducibility of myocardial radiomic features between energy-integrating detector and photon-counting detector CT angiography

European Radiology Experimental volume 8, Article number: 101 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Radiomics is not yet used in clinical practice due to concerns regarding its susceptibility to technical factors. We aimed to assess the stability and interscan and interreader reproducibility of myocardial radiomic features between energy-integrating detector computed tomography (EID-CT) and photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) in patients undergoing coronary CT angiography (CCTA) on both systems.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA on an EID-CT were prospectively enrolled for a PCD-CT CCTA within 30 days. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) at various keV levels and polychromatic images (T3D) were generated for PCD-CT, with image reconstruction parameters standardized between scans. Two readers performed myocardial segmentation and 110 radiomic features were compared intraindividually between EID-CT and PDC-CT series. The agreement of parameters was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and paired t-test for the stability of the parameters.

Results

Eighteen patients (15 males) aged 67.6 ± 9.7 years (mean ± standard deviation) were included. Besides polychromatic PCD-CT reconstructions, 60- and 70-keV VMIs showed the highest feature stability compared to EID-CT (96%, 90%, and 92%, respectively). The interscan reproducibility of features was moderate even in the most favorable comparisons (median ICC 0.50 [interquartile range 0.20–0.60] for T3D; 0.56 [0.33–0.74] for 60 keV; 0.50 [0.36–0.62] for 70 keV). Interreader reproducibility was excellent for the PCD-CT series and good for EID-CT segmentations.

Conclusion

Most myocardial radiomic features remain stable between EID-CT and PCD-CT. While features demonstrated moderate reproducibility between scanners, technological advances associated with PCD-CT may lead to greater reproducibility, potentially expediting future standardization efforts.

Relevance statement

While the use of PCD-CT may facilitate reduced interreader variability in radiomics analysis, the observed interscanner variations in comparison to EID-CT should be taken into account in future research, with efforts being made to minimize their impact in future radiomics studies.

Key Points

  • Most myocardial radiomic features resulted in being stable between EID-CT and PCD-CT on certain VMIs.

  • The reproducibility of parameters between detector technologies was limited.

  • PCD-CT improved interreader reproducibility of myocardial radiomic features.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Radiomics has become a promising area of research in precision medicine, providing opportunities to facilitate disease phenotyping based on radiological images [1]. By extracting and mathematically processing multiple features from a single volume of interest, it is possible to create predictive models that may potentially be beneficial in diagnostics, predicting outcomes, or selecting treatment individually [2,3,4,5]. Several studies have shown that exploiting the potential of radiomic analysis can improve the diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and may overcome the limitations of qualitative evaluation, which is influenced by the experience of the individual reader [6, 7]. Radiomic models have demonstrated efficacy in detecting advanced atherosclerotic lesions, and plaque vulnerability markers—such as the napkin-ring sign—and in confirming the pericoronary fat radiomic profile as an independent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events [8,9,10]. Recently, the ability of texture-based radiomic models has also been proposed to differentiate between healthy and infarcted myocardium, and identify patients at high risk of left ventricular hypertrophy and those with recurrent ventricular tachycardia [11,12,13]. Despite its advantages, radiomics are not yet widely used in clinical practice due to concerns regarding its susceptibility to a number of technical factors and the effect of segmentation performed by different readers [14,15,16,17,18].

Recently, studies have demonstrated multiple benefits of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) in comparison to conventional energy-integrating detector computed tomography (EID-CT), such as enhanced contrast-to-noise ratio and increased spatial resolution, which are crucial image quality factors that ensure the accuracy of texture analysis [16, 19, 20]. However, it remains unclear whether and to what extent this new detector technology affects the stability of texture features, and a systematic comparison with conventional EID-CT may bring standardization and eventual validation of the most robust features.

Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of novel PCD-CT technology on the stability, interscanner reproducibility, and interreader reproducibility of myocardial radiomic features through a systematic intraindividual comparison of a cohort of patients undergoing CCTA on both EID-CT and PCD-CT. Given the study design, it was hypothesized that any discrepancies observed in radiomic parameters could be attributed primarily to differences in detector technology.

Methods

Patient population

The protocol for this single-center, prospective study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board (see “Declarations”). It was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and all subjects provided written informed consent. Consecutive patients referred for standard-of-care imaging on an EID-CT system were asked to be enrolled for a research PCD-CT scan within 30 days, between August 2021 and March 2022. Patients over 18 years of age undergoing clinically indicated CCTA met the inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria were as follows: contraindication to iodinated contrast media, decreased renal function (glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/m2), pregnancy or lactation, inability to consent, and inconsistent acquisition modes between scans.

CCTA acquisition parameters

First, a clinical CCTA was carried out using a third-generation dual-source EID-CT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). Research CCTA was subsequently performed using a first-generation clinical dual-source PCD-CT system (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens). EID-CT scans were carried out using a high-pitch or sequential cardiac protocol, while all PCD-CT datasets were acquired in sequential mode with end-diastolic ECG triggering. As per the standard clinical protocol, the tube voltage for EID-CT was automatically determined by the scanner at 90 kVp, 110 kVp, or 130 kVp, depending on the patient’s body habitus. For PCD-CT, tube voltage was manually set at 120 kVp. Automatic tube current modulation (CareDose 4D, Siemens) was used for EID-CT, while the tube current for PCD-CT acquisition was adjusted to closely match the expected radiation dose (volume CT dose index) between the two scans. Scan parameters are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 CCTA acquisition and reconstruction parameters
Full size table

The contrast administration protocol used was identical for both scanners. Based on our institution’s standard clinical injection protocol, patients were administered a triphasic injection comprising an initial bolus of 40–60 mL of iodinated contrast agent (Omnipaque 350, GE Healthcare, Boston, MA, or Ultravist 370, Bayer, Berlin, Germany), followed by a 50% dilute mixture of contrast agent and saline (20 mL), and finally a saline chaser (25 mL). The volume of contrast material was kept constant between EID-CT and PCD-CT scans, at a constant injection rate (3.5–5.0 mL/s). Unless clinically contraindicated, patients with heart rates > 70 beats per minute received intravenous administration of 5 mg metoprolol and approximately 0.4 mg nitroglycerin 5 min before the scan.

Image reconstruction

Images from EID-CT and PCD-CT were reconstructed as equivalent as possible at a slice thickness of 0.6 mm, using a Bv40 vascular kernel, a matrix size of 512 × 512, and a consistent field of view between scanners, as reported in Table 1. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) were reconstructed on PCD-CT at seven different levels (40 keV, 50 keV, 60 keV, 70 keV, 90 keV, 120 keV, and 190 keV). Additionally, “T3D” (Siemens Healthineers) were reconstructed for PCD-CT, which are considered most comparable to a conventional polychromatic reconstruction on EID-CT systems, as they accumulate all x-ray photons with energies above the lowest threshold energy of 20 keV and therefore integrate polychromatic information [21]. A similar level of iterative reconstruction was used for EID-CT and PCD-CT, with a strength level of 2 for advanced modeled iterative reconstruction and quantum iterative reconstruction, respectively.

Segmentation of the left ventricle

The image datasets were exported and segmented using investigational software (MM Radiomics v1.4.0, Siemens). Although segmentation was performed manually, a threshold-assisted segmentation tool was employed, with the exclusion of voxels outside the specified threshold interval of the myocardium (from −30 HU to 250 HU), in order to exclude adjacent tissues (epicardial fat, blood pool) from the analysis. Subsequently, the ‘Fill Cavities’ function was applied to the segmented volumes, resulting in a further augmentation of the volume by all voxels within the object that are not connected to the external surfaces, based on a three-dimensional six-neighborhood relationship. The segmentation area included the trabecular and papillary muscles as well. The segmentations were performed by two readers with 4 years and 6 years of experience in cardiovascular CT and the segmentation of the more experienced reader was used for final analysis. If necessary, the delineation of boundaries was corrected by software-specific refinement tools. For patients scanned on the PCD-CT system, segmentations were performed using the 70-keV series, and the resulting volume of interest was transferred to the other six VMI reconstructions and the T3D dataset.

Feature extraction

A total of 110 radiomic features were generated for each dataset using the same investigational software (MM Radiomics, Siemens). The extracted feature classes consisted of original first-order (n = 18), textural [gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), n = 24; gray level dependence matrix (GLDM), n = 14; gray level run length matrix (GLRLM), n = 16; gray level size zone matrix (GLSZM), n = 16; and neighboring gray-tone difference matrix (NGTDM), n = 5], as well as two- and three-dimensional-based shape features (n = 17). In total, 17,820 original myocardial radiomic features were extracted from the datasets. Detailed mathematical descriptions of feature families and their corresponding feature members are available elsewhere [22].

Statistical analysis

Normally distributed variables are reported as mean ± standard deviation, while those with non-normal distribution are expressed as median and 25th–75th percentiles. Categorical variables are reported as absolute frequencies and proportions. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was applied to evaluate the normality of continuous parameters. Normally distributed descriptive statistics were compared using paired t-tests, while non-normally distributed variables were compared using the Wilcoxon test. Pairwise comparisons between myocardial radiomic features of EID-CT and PCD-CT were performed with paired samples t-test; p-values < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant and interpreted as indicative of unstable features between EID-CT- and PCD-CT-based reconstructions (VMI and T3D). The percentage of features that exhibit non-significant pairwise differences was evaluated to assess the stability across each PCD-CT series and between PCD-CT and EID-CT datasets. Shape class features were excluded in the comparison between all VMIs and T3D images acquired on PCD-CT, since the same volume of interest was transferred across all reconstructions. A two-way mixed intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the overall degree of agreement between datasets and the segmentations performed by the two readers. ICC was interpreted as follows: poor (ICC ≤ 0.39), moderate (ICC = 0.40–0.59), good (ICC = 0.60–0.74), and excellent (ICC ≥ 0.75) [23]. Manhattan plots were generated to graphically display both results. Statistical analysis was performed using dedicated software (SPSS Statistics, version 27.0, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA; MedCalc, version 20.2, San Diego, CA, USA). The stepwise summary of the analysis is provided in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The overall acquisition, processing, and analysis framework of the datasets. Both EID-CT and PCD-CT datasets of enrolled patients were segmented (a) by two readers. A total of 18 first-order, 75 textural, and 17 shape-based radiomic features were extracted (b) from the segmented volume of interests. These values were then compared (c) between EID-CT and PCD-CT reconstructions, among different VMIs, and between different segmentations to assess inter-reader agreement. EID-CT, Energy-integrating detector CT; GLCM, Gray level co-occurrence matrix; GLDM, Gray level dependency matrix; GLRLM, Gray level run length matrix; GLSZM, Gray level size zone matrix; NGTDM, Neighboring gray-tone difference matrix; PCD-CT, Photon-counting detector CT; VMI, Virtual monoenergetic image

Full size image

Results

Patient population

A total of 24 patients were enrolled consecutively and scanned on both EID-CT and PCD-CT. Overall, six scans were excluded from the final analysis due to inconsistent acquisition modes between the scanners (EID-CT, high-pitch helical; PCD-CT, sequential). The final cohort consisted of 18 patients aged 67.6 ± 9.7 years (mean ± standard deviation), and 15 males (83.3%). The median time interval between the two scans was 7.0 days (interquartile range [IQR] 3.0–15.0). While heart rate did not differ significantly between EID-CT and PCD-CT, PCD-CT was performed with significantly lower volume CT dose index and dose length product values. Further details are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Patient characteristics
Full size table

Stability of radiomic features

The stability of features across datasets was evaluated by calculating the percentage of features that exhibit non-significant pairwise differences. Across different VMIs on PCD-CT, a number of comparisons produced a high percentage of stable features (40 keV versus 50 keV, 96%; 50 keV versus 60 keV, 96%; 60 keV versus 70 keV, 96%; 70 keV versus 90 keV, 95%; 70 keV versus 120 keV, 92%; 70 keV versus 190 keV, 92%; 90 keV versus 120 keV, 98%; 90 keV versus 190 keV, 95%; 120 keV versus 190 keV, 98%). The polychromatic (T3D) PCD-CT reconstruction produced the highest number of stable features in comparison to 50 keV (T3D versus 50 keV, 92%) and 60 keV (T3D versus 60 keV, 100%).

In terms of feature reproducibility between scanners, EID-CT showed the highest similarity to polychromatic PCD-CT reconstruction (EID-CT versus T3D, 96%), with only four features differing significantly between them (firstorder_Median, gldm_GrayLevelNonUniformity, grlm_GrayLevelNonUniformity, ngtdm_Coarseness). Across different VMI levels, 60 keV (EID-CT versus 60 keV, 90%) and 70 keV (EID-CT versus 70 keV, 92%) demonstrated a high proportion of stable features, with 70 keV showing significant differences in only nine features (firstorder_Median, Mean and firstorder_10Percentile, gldm_DependenceNonUniformity, glrlm_RunLengthNonUniformity and GrayLevelNonUniformity, glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformity, and SizeZoneNonUniformity, ngtdm_Coarseness). Among all 110 original radiomic features, two were statistically different between EID-CT and all PCD-CT reconstructions: firstorder_Median and ngtdm_Coarseness. Figure 2 details the proportion of stable features in all pairwise comparisons, while an overview of all features with significant differences is presented in Supplementary Table S1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Heatmap of the proportion of stable features (without a significant difference) between pairwise comparisons. A high number of features demonstrated stability for EID-CT compared to T3D, 60 keV and 70 keV PCD-CT reconstructions. Several features showed non-significant differences between different VMI levels as well, with an increasingly favorable trend at higher VMI levels. EID-CT, Energy-integrating detector CT; PCD-CT, Photon-counting detector CT

Full size image

Reproducibility of radiomic features

A higher proportion of stable features generally led to higher pairwise ICC values, with 11.8% (13/110) of T3D features showing excellent and 12.7% (14/110) demonstrating good reproducibility compared to EID-CT. Similar but slightly more favorable tendencies could be noted for 50 keV (excellent ICC, 18.2% [20/110]; good ICC, 21.8% [24/110]), 60 keV (excellent ICC, 24.5% [27/110]; good ICC, 21.8% [24/110]), and 70 keV (excellent ICC, 13.6% [15/110]; good ICC, 21.8% [24/110]) VMI levels. Median ICC values showed a moderate overall reproducibility of T3D (ICC = 0.50 [0.20–0.59]), 50 keV (ICC = 0.49 [0.22–0.68]), 60 keV (ICC = 0.56 [0.34–0.74]), 70 keV (ICC = 0.50 [0.36–0.62]), and 90 keV (ICC = 0.41 [0.26–0.48]) reconstructions with EID-CT. On the other hand, overall reproducibility for 40 keV (ICC = 0.30 [0.12–0.58]), 120 keV (ICC = 0.39 [0.26–0.47]), and 190 keV (ICC = 0.39 [0.23–0.46]) was poor. Detailed results regarding the reproducibility of radiomic features can be found in Fig. 3 and in Supplementary Table S2.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Manhattan plots of radiomic features and their respective ICC values between EID-CT and PCD-CT reconstructions. Manhattan plots of ICC values are presented for each pairwise comparison with EID-CT. The y-axis depicts the ICC values, while radiomic features are displayed along the x-axis, stratified by radiomic feature classes. The red line indicates an ICC of 0.75 and the proportion of radiomic features with ICC above this is presented for each class. EID-CT, Energy-integrating detector CT; GLCM, Gray level co-occurrence matrix; GLDM, Gray level dependence matrix; GLRLM, Gray level run length matrix; GLSZM, Gray level size zone matrix; ICC, Intraclass correlation coefficient; NGTDM, Neighboring gray-tone difference matrix; PCD-CT, Photon-counting detector CT

Full size image

Interreader reproducibility

ICC values used to assess reproducibility between segmentations performed by different readers showed that EID-CT-based features had excellent reproducibility for 40.0% (44/110) and good for 10.9% (12/110) of all comparisons, while PCD-CT-based polychromatic reconstruction produced excellent reproducibility for 73.6% (81/110) and good for 20.9% (23/110) of all assessed features. A high proportion of features showed excellent-to-good reproducibility for VMI levels as well, with all the VMI datasets displaying favorable tendencies. Median ICC values showed good overall reproducibility for EID-CT (ICC = 0.61 [0.37–0.93]), and excellent for all PCD-CT reconstructions (highest ICC = 0.95 [0.73–0.99] scored by the polychromatic T3D). A detailed overview of all ICC values resulting from different segmentations of readers is displayed in Fig. 4 and in Supplementary Table S3.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Manhattan plots of radiomic features with corresponding ICC values between the two segmentations performed by different readers. Manhattan plots of ICC values are presented for each pairwise comparison between segmentations. The y-axis depicts the ICC values, while radiomic features are displayed along the z-axis, stratified by radiomic feature classes. The red line indicates an ICC of 0.75 and the proportion of radiomic features with ICC above this is presented for each class. GLCM, Gray level co-occurrence matrix; GLDM, Gray level dependence matrix; GLRLM, Gray level run length matrix; GLSZM, Gray level size zone matrix; ICC, Intraclass correlation coefficient; NGTDM, Neighboring gray-tone difference matrix

Full size image

Discussion

This study compared the radiomic features of myocardial tissue in patients undergoing CCTA with both EID-CT and PCD-CT, utilizing similar acquisition and reconstruction protocols within a brief timeframe. The most important findings are that polychromatic T3D and VMI reconstructions at 60 keV and 70 keV showed the highest proportion of stable features compared to EID-CT. While a considerable percentage of features (39−96%) demonstrated stability in other pairwise comparisons as well, the overall reproducibility of features was moderate even in the most favorable comparisons. On the other hand, the reproducibility of features between segmentations performed by different readers may be superior with the PCD-CT technology (highest ICC = 0.95 [0.73–0.99] by polychromatic T3D) compared to EID-CT (ICC = 0.61 [0.37–0.93]), as all VMI levels and polychromatic T3D PCD-CT reconstructions outperformed the EID-CT series in this aspect.

Cardiac magnetic resonance is still considered the reference standard method for myocardial characterization due to its high soft-tissue contrast and favorable signal-to-noise ratio [24, 25]. The recently introduced PCD-CT system, however, provides improved contrast-to-noise ratio and soft-tissue differentiation over previous EID-CT systems by weighting x-ray quanta equally, regardless of their energy level [26]. Moreover, previous dual-energy CT-based spectral reconstructions have had limited applicability in cardiac imaging due to inherent limitations in temporal resolution. With PCD-CT, spectral data is available in every scan without compromising temporal resolution and does not require specific dual-energy acquisition protocols. The technological advances of PCD-CT, in conjunction with the enhanced spatial resolution of the detector, facilitate the acquisition of a greater number of image details compared to conventional EID-CT.

The potential benefits of the PCD-CT technology may extend to radiomics, where it could offer a more comprehensive representation of encoded information, ultimately leading to differences in texture analysis profiles. The question of whether more detailed radiomic profiles with PCD-CT offer superior predictive models for myocardial pathologies remains unanswered and further research is warranted [20]. These advances promise more reproducible measurements, such as quantitative HU accuracy, when combined with PCD-CT’s ability to eliminate electronic noise [27]. Our findings seem to support this view as EID-CT-based segmentations showed only good reproducibility between readers, while all PCD-CT segmentations demonstrated excellent reproducibility, with approximately 95% for T3D comparisons, producing excellent-to-good ICC values (0.62–1.00).

Myocardial radiomics from CCTA images has focused on identifying objective and quantitative myocardial texture metrics that distinguish healthy from diseased tissue. Previous investigations on EID-CT technology have shown favorable diagnostic performance for first-order and textural features for various purposes. Special attention has been given to characterizing myocardial scar and fibrosis: studies demonstrated the feasibility of different radiomic features for distinguishing health from acutely and chronically infarcted myocardium in CCTA. Interestingly, radiomic texture analysis was also able to identify different patterns of structural micro-architectural remodeling characterizing patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia [12, 13, 28,29,30]. The interscanner stability of radiomic features in our study may suggest that these objective textural parameters may also be replicated using specific PCD-CT reconstructions. Polychromatic T3D and VMI reconstructions at 60–70 keV seem to produce radiomic features with considerably high stability compared to EID-CT, potentially proposing the interchangeability of features between scanners. Nonetheless, the moderate reproducibility of features between scanners highlights that previously described EID-CT-based parameters cannot be directly translated into PCD-CT datasets and further investigations must address the unique predictive power of these series too before considering a direct translation of previous results to PCD technology. In a recent publication reporting results in 30 patients [31], authors discovered that a specific set of radiomic features indicating texture changes in the left ventricular myocardium correlated with the severity of coronary artery calcification, estimated by the Agatston score. Considering that the PCD technology may encode different, potentially more complex textural information, similar efforts are warranted to reproduce constellations that had previously been described on EID-CT.

At the advent of photon-counting technology, evidence regarding the reproducibility of PCD-CT-based radiomic features has been scarce in the literature. Ayx et al [32] recently assessed the comparative feature properties of 50 patients (25 patients scanned on PCD-CT versus 25 other patients on EID-CT) and found that more than 15% of original radiomic features differed between EID-CT and polychromatic PCD-CT series. Besides extending the head-to-head comparison to different VMI levels as well, the current study suggests that feature stability is, in fact, higher when assessed within the same patient.

The intraindividual and interscanner comparison of radiomic features represents a novelty in the field and may pave the way for further studies with larger populations employing similar designs that could lead to inter-scanner standardization. This becomes increasingly necessary with the continuously growing number of PCD-CT scanners available. Additionally, Wolf et al [33] have previously examined reproducibility across various VMI levels and reported patterns of escalating reproducibility with increasing VMI levels. While these findings align with the currently reported tendencies, the proportion of stable features reported here (95–98%) is considerably higher than that reported by these authors (77–89%). A possible explanation may lie in the study design, as the stability of features was previously assessed only for a single slice of the myocardium, whereas the current study assessed the myocardium as a whole, potentially increasing robustness.

The definition of stability concerning radiomic features is currently not universally accepted. In fact, stability has been previously delineated using both an ICC-derived approach and a significance-based methodology [33, 34]. To ensure a more thorough analysis, we chose to incorporate both methods to elucidate differences between the scanners. The variance in definitions observed across various studies emphasizes the importance of standardization efforts in the field of radiomics.

This study has limitations that merit consideration. First, the number of patients included in this study can be considered limited, although is within the average number of patients for many radiomics studies in the literature. Nevertheless, the uniqueness of this study lies in the enrollment of patients who underwent CCTA with two separate scanners in a short timeframe, providing the best potential for scanner-dependent feature comparison. Furthermore, larger trials that entail exposing patients to two separate CT scans are seldom approved due to radiation safety concerns. Second, while reconstruction parameters were meticulously matched during post-processing, the slight variation in tube voltage settings between PCD-CT and EID-CT acquisitions can be viewed as a potential confounding factor. This could reduce the presented reproducibility of features, but the currently proposed trends are likely to persist in a study that employs matching kV levels too. Third, while the advanced technological features of PCD-CT have the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing different myocardial pathologies, no such analysis has been conducted currently owing to the low number of scans with pathologies confirmed by reference standard examinations. Additionally, while our study focused on analyzing original radiomic features, examining higher-order features could provide a more comprehensive comparison.

The present study was designed to assess overall trends and may serve as the basis for future endeavors. Lastly, PCD-CT technology has recently enabled the acquisition of ultrahigh-resolution CCTA, which was not yet available at our institution at the time of this current study. It is, however, a topic of interest to explore the effect of an increased spatial resolution on texture features. In this intraindividual study design, we concluded that the majority of original radiomic features remain stable between EID-CT and PCD-CT polychromatic reconstructions (T3D) and certain VMI levels (60 keV and 70 keV). This relative stability, however, does not necessarily translate to high correlation coefficients, warranting the need for standardization and wide-scale validation of PCD-CT-based radiomics before routine implementation in both research and clinical settings. On the other hand, the technological improvements linked with the novel PCD-CT technology may pave the way to a higher reproducibility between readers, ultimately expediting this process.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CCTA:

Coronary computed tomography angiography

EID-CT:

Energy-integrating detector computed tomography

GLCM:

Gray level co-occurrence matrix

GLDM:

Gray level dependence matrix

GLRLM:

Gray level run length matrix

GLSZM:

Gray level size zone matrix

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

NGTDM:

Neighboring gray-tone difference matrix

PCD-CT:

Photon-counting detector computed tomography

VMI:

Virtual monoenergetic images

References

  1. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015151169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM et al (2017) Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14:749–762. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rizzo S, Botta F, Raimondi S et al (2018) Radiomics: the facts and the challenges of image analysis. Eur Radiol Exp 2:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0068-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R et al (2012) Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer 48:441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Z, Wang S, Dong D et al (2019) The applications of radiomics in precision diagnosis and treatment of oncology: opportunities and challenges. Theranostics 9:1303–1322. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.30309

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Polidori T, De Santis D, Rucci C et al (2023) Radiomics applications in cardiac imaging: a comprehensive review. Radiol Med 128:922–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01658-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu P, Xue Y, Schoepf UJ et al (2021) Radiomics: the next frontier of cardiac computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 14:e011747. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.011747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oikonomou EK, Williams MC, Kotanidis CP et al (2019) A novel machine learning-derived radiotranscriptomic signature of perivascular fat improves cardiac risk prediction using coronary CT angiography. Eur Heart J 40:3529–3543. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kolossváry M, Karády J, Szilveszter B et al (2017) Radiomic features are superior to conventional quantitative computed tomographic metrics to identify coronary plaques with napkin-ring sign. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 10:e006843. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006843

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kolossváry M, Karády J, Kikuchi Y et al (2019) Radiomics versus visual and histogram-based assessment to identify atheromatous lesions at coronary CT angiography: an ex vivo study. Radiology 293:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019190407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kay FU, Abbara S, Joshi PH, Garg S, Khera A, Peshock RM (2020) Identification of high-risk left ventricular hypertrophy on calcium scoring cardiac computed tomography scans: validation in the DHS. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 13:e009678. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009678

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hinzpeter R, Wagner MW, Wurnig MC, Seifert B, Manka R, Alkadhi H (2017) Texture analysis of acute myocardial infarction with CT: first experience study. PLoS One 12:e0186876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Esposito A, Palmisano A, Antunes S et al (2018) Assessment of remote myocardium heterogeneity in patients with ventricular tachycardia using texture analysis of late iodine enhancement (LIE) cardiac computed tomography (cCT) images. Mol Imaging Biol 20:816–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-018-1175-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ayx I, Froelich MF, Baumann S, Papavassiliu T, Schoenberg SO (2023) Radiomics in cardiac computed tomography. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020307

  15. Mackin D, Fave X, Zhang L et al (2015) Measuring computed tomography scanner variability of radiomics features. Invest Radiol 50:757–765. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000180

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mayerhoefer ME, Szomolanyi P, Jirak D, Materka A, Trattnig S (2009) Effects of MRI acquisition parameter variations and protocol heterogeneity on the results of texture analysis and pattern discrimination: an application-oriented study. Med Phys 36:1236–1243. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3081408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Solomon J, Mileto A, Nelson RC, Roy Choudhury K, Samei E (2016) Quantitative features of liver lesions, lung nodules, and renal stones at multi-detector row CT examinations: dependency on radiation dose and reconstruction algorithm. Radiology 279:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015150892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kolossváry M, Jávorszky N, Karády J et al (2021) Effect of vessel wall segmentation on volumetric and radiomic parameters of coronary plaques with adverse characteristics. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 15:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2020.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jirák D, Dezortová M, Hájek M (2004) Phantoms for texture analysis of MR images. Long-term and multi-center study. Med Phys 31:616–622. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1646231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Willemink MJ, Persson M, Pourmorteza A, Pelc NJ, Fleischmann D (2018) Photon-counting CT: technical principles and clinical prospects. Radiology 289:293–312. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018172656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Euler A, Higashigaito K, Mergen V et al (2022) High-pitch photon-counting detector computed tomography angiography of the aorta: intraindividual comparison to energy-integrating detector computed tomography at equal radiation dose. Invest Radiol 57:115–121. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C et al (2017) Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res 77:e104–e107. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Baeßler B, Weiss K, Pinto Dos Santos D (2019) Robustness and reproducibility of radiomics in magnetic resonance imaging: a phantom study. Invest Radiol 54:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hassani C, Saremi F, Varghese BA, Duddalwar V (2020) Myocardial radiomics in cardiac MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 214:536–545. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.21986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Patel AR, Kramer CM (2017) Role of cardiac magnetic resonance in the diagnosis and prognosis of nonischemic cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:1180–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.08.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. McCollough CH, Rajendran K, Leng S et al (2023) The technical development of photon-counting detector CT. Eur Radiol 33:5321–5330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09545-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Symons R, Cork TE, Sahbaee P et al (2017) Low-dose lung cancer screening with photon-counting CT: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol 62:202–213. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/62/1/202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Antunes S, Esposito A, Palmisanov A, Colantoni C, de Cobelli F, Del Maschio A (2016) Characterization of normal and scarred myocardium based on texture analysis of cardiac computed tomography images. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2016:4161–4164. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mannil M, von Spiczak J, Manka R, Alkadhi H (2018) Texture analysis and machine learning for detecting myocardial infarction in noncontrast low-dose computed tomography: unveiling the invisible. Invest Radiol 53:338–343. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shu ZY, Cui SJ, Zhang YQ et al (2022) Predicting chronic myocardial ischemia using CCTA-based radiomics machine learning nomogram. J Nucl Cardiol 29:262–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02204-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ayx I, Tharmaseelan H, Hertel A et al (2022) Myocardial radiomics texture features associated with increased coronary calcium score. First results of a photon-counting CT. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071663

  32. Ayx I, Tharmaseelan H, Hertel A et al (2022) Comparison study of myocardial radiomics feature properties on energy-integrating and photon-counting detector CT. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051294

  33. Wolf EV, Müller L, Schoepf UJ et al (2023) Photon-counting detector CT-based virtual monoenergetic reconstructions: repeatability and reproducibility of radiomics features of an organic phantom and human myocardium. Eur Radiol Exp 7:59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-023-00371-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hertel A, Tharmaseelan H, Rotkopf LT et al (2023) Phantom-based radiomics feature test-retest stability analysis on photon-counting detector CT. Eur Radiol 33:4905–4914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09460-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

In this manuscript, the authors did not use any artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technologies, such as Large Language Models (LLMs), chatbots, or image creators.

Funding

This study has received funding from Siemens Healthineers. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

    Giuseppe Tremamunno, Akos Varga-Szemes, U. Joseph Schoepf, Emese Zsarnoczay, Nicola Fink, Gilberto J. Aquino, Jim O’Doherty, Tilman Emrich & Milan Vecsey-Nagy

  2. Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Giuseppe Tremamunno & Andrea Laghi

  3. Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

    Emese Zsarnoczay

  4. Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

    Nicola Fink

  5. Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA, USA

    Jim O’Doherty

  6. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

    Tilman Emrich

  7. Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

    Milan Vecsey-Nagy

Authors
  1. Giuseppe Tremamunno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Akos Varga-Szemes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. Joseph Schoepf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea Laghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Emese Zsarnoczay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nicola Fink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gilberto J. Aquino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jim O’Doherty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tilman Emrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Milan Vecsey-Nagy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors made substantial contributions in conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and final approval of the version submitted to the Journal. All the authors gave consent for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tilman Emrich.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol for this single-center, Health Insurance Portability, and Accountability Act-compliant study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board (Medical University of South Carolina, Pro00108359, 4/13/2021), was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and all subjects provided written informed consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies: AV-S receives institutional research support and/or personal subscriptions from Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc. and Elucid Bioimaging. UJS receives institutional research support and/or personal fees from Bayer, Bracco, Elucid BioImaging, Guerbet, HeartFlow, Inc., Keya Medical, and Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc. JO is an employee of Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc. TE receives travel support and speaker fee from Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, and institutional research support by Siemens Healthineers. For the remaining authors, no competing interests were declared. Akos Varga-Szemes is the Deputy Editor and Tilman Emrich is a member of the Scientific Editorial Board Section “Computed Tomography” for European Radiology Experimental. None of them had any role in handling this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1.

Radiomic features with significant differences between EID-CT all PCD-CT reconstructions. Supplementary Table 2. Two-way mixed intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showing reproducibility of original radiomics features between EID-CT and all PCD-CT reconstructions. Supplementary Table 3. Two-way mixed intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showing inter-reader reproducibility of original radiomics features between the two segmentations performed by different readers.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tremamunno, G., Varga-Szemes, A., Schoepf, U.J. et al. Intraindividual reproducibility of myocardial radiomic features between energy-integrating detector and photon-counting detector CT angiography. Eur Radiol Exp 8, 101 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00493-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00493-7

Keywords