Skip to main content
European Radiology Experimental
Download PDF
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The contribution of the 1H-MRS lipid signal to cervical cancer prognosis: a preliminary study

European Radiology Experimental volume 6, Article number: 47 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the lipid peak derived from 1H magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy in assessing cervical cancer prognosis, particularly in assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).

Methods

We enrolled 17 patients with histologically proven cervical cancer who underwent 3-T MR imaging at baseline. In addition to conventional imaging sequences for pelvic assessment, the protocol included a single-voxel point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence, with repetition time of 1,500 ms and echo times of 28 and 144 ms. Spectra were analysed using the LCModel fitting routine, thus extracting multiple metabolites, including lipids (Lip) and total choline (tCho). Patients with LACC were treated with NACT and reassessed by MRI at term. Based on tumour volume reduction, patients were classified as good responder (GR; tumour volume reduction > 50%) and poor responder or nonresponder (PR-or-NR; tumour volume reduction ≤ 50%).

Results

Of 17 patients, 11 were LACC. Of these 11, only 6 had both completed NACT and had good-quality 1H-MR spectra; 3 GR and 3 PR-or-NR. A significant difference in lipid values was observed in the two groups of patients, particularly with higher Lip values and higher Lip/tCho ratio in PR-NR patients (p =0.040). A significant difference was also observed in choline distribution (tCho), with higher values in GR patients (p = 0.040).

Conclusions

Assessment of lipid peak at 1H-MR spectroscopy could be an additional quantitative parameter in predicting the response to NACT in patients with LACC.

Key points

  • 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy could predict therapy response in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).

  • High lipid signal and lipids/choline ratio correlated with poor prognosis in patients with LACC.

  • Lipid signal can be considered a new noninvasive prognostic biomarker in patients with LACC.

Background

Uterin cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common malignancy and cancer-related mortality cause in women worldwide, with a higher prevalence in developing countries [1]. Although CC incidence has been reduced by human papilloma virus screening and vaccination programs, GLOBOCAN still estimates more than half a million new cases per year and more than 300,000 deaths per year [2, 3].

Revised and updated in 2018, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification is the most widely used for staging cervical cancer [4]. As for treatment, surgery represents the gold standard in early-stage CC. However, a significant portion of these patients are already diagnosed as locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), i.e., FIGO 2018 stage from IIb to IVa, thus requiring combined therapies, such as concurrent chemo-radiotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radical surgery [5].

Due to its excellent soft-tissue characterisation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents the imaging technique of choice for the staging of CC, playing a fundamental role in assessing therapeutic strategy and response to therapy [6, 7]. Besides the anatomical characterisation provided by conventional MRI, magnetic resonance offers functional multiparametric approaches in clinical oncology to improve in vivo tissue characterisation [8, 9]. Among them, localised proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) allows in vivo metabolic characterisation of a body district or a suspicious lesion giving noninvasive information useful for a more accurate and faster diagnosis [10,11,12].

For more than two decades, in vivo MRS has been widely used to investigate lesions at different anatomical sites [13,14,15]. Technical difficulties due to artifacts caused by respiratory movements, bowel peristalsis and possible contamination of the signal by pericervical fat have limited the use of MRS in the evaluation of the abdomen and pelvis in the past.

In recent years, technical improvements of the MRI systems and software have allowed the extension of 1H-MRS investigation to the pelvis and its pathologies, including CC. In a first study, women with known CC revealed strong resonances (large peaks) corresponding to total choline (tCho), whereas normal controls showed spectral peaks corresponding to lipids (Lip) and creatine (Cr) [16]. A study by Booth et al. investigated the role of in vivo1H-MRS as a useful tool to distinguish between benign and malignant gynaecologic lesions, including CC. They focused on the evaluation of the tCho signal, but no difference was observed in this peak between benign and malignant forms [17]. A recent study performed at 7 T found 1H-MRS useful in differentiating the CC grading by estimating the level of unsaturation of fatty acid analysing the lipid signal 2.1/1.3 ppm ratio. In particular, poorly differentiated tumours showed more fatty acid unsaturation [18]. Although interesting, this study is limited to the high-field magnet, which is not common in clinical settings.

Using the most popular MRI systems (1.5 and 3 T) with less signal and spectral resolution, it is difficult to quantify the signal at 2.1 ppm and distinguish it from total N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), which has been observed in breast, cervical, prostate and ovarian cancer and is assigned to the −CH3 moiety of sialic acid or N-acetyl groups of glycoproteins [19]. Studies combining in vivo end ex vivo1H-MRS found that the presence of the −CH2 signal in vivo (resonating at 1.28 ppm) predicted the presence of cancer with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 94% [20]. The role of 1H-MRS as a response biomarker in CC has also been investigated, but with uncertain results [21, 22]. Up to now, 1H-MRS has shown limited results in the assessment of CC, and to the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated the role of the lipid peak in predicting response to therapy in LACC.

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic contribution of a quantitative 1H-MRS protocol, specifically the role of the lipid peak, in assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in LACC.

Methods

Patients

The study was approved by the Departmental Ethical Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all individuals before participation. Patients aged from 18 to 5 years with histopathologically confirmed primary cervical carcinoma and clinical or ultrasound suspicion of locally advanced disease were included in the study. Any patient who had undergone prior surgery or chemotherapy or had a concurrent other tumour was excluded. Between December 2019 and July 2021, 17 patients with histopathologically proven cervical cancer and suspected locally advanced disease underwent pelvic MRI examination, with the addition of a 1H-MRS sequence as part of the protocol. Two radiologists with respectively 25 (L.M.) and 5 (M.D.) years of experience in female pelvis imaging, evaluated in consensus the baseline MRI examination and staged the patients according to FIGO 2018 classification [4]. Of 17 patients, 11 were evaluated to have a LACC and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (3 cycles of cisplatin 75 mg/mq and taxol 175 mg/mq). At treatment completion, patients were revaluated (follow-up MRI) and the two same radiologists (L.M., M.D.) assessed in consensus the percentage of tumour volume reduction. Patients were then divided into two groups: good responders (GR) if tumour volume reduction was > 50% and poor responders or nonresponders (PR-or-NR) if reduction was ≤ 50%.

MRI and 1H-MRS protocol

Images were acquired using a superconducting magnet operating at 3 T (Discovery MR 750; General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with a 32-channel phased-array coil positioned on the lower abdomen. In order to have moderate bladder filling, patients were asked to urinate one hour before the examination. All subjects entered the magnet in the supine position, using the feet-first mode. Prior to the examination, 20 mg of hyoscine N-butyl bromide (Buscopan; Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany) was injected intravenously to reduce bowel movements.

The imaging included the following sequences: sagittal, paracoronal and paraaxial T2-weighted fast spin-echo, the latter two oriented parallel to the long axis and short axis of the cervical canal, respectively; paraaxial T1-weighted fast spin-echo, with and without fat saturation; paraaxial diffusion-weighted imaging with b values of 0, 500, and 1,000 s/mm2 to obtain apparent diffusion coefficient maps; axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo from the renal hila to the pubic symphysis. Scanning parameters are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Magnetic resonance imaging protocol
Full size table

1H-MRS was acquired using a single-voxel point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence, with repetition time (TR) of 1,500 ms and echo times (TE) of 28 and 144 ms. As indicated by the most experienced radiologist (L.M.), for each subject, the voxel (average volume 18 × 18 × 18 mm3) was positioned in the central part of the tumour, carefully avoiding contamination from surrounding tissues and areas of necrosis, using as reference the T2-weighted images acquired along the three orthogonal planes. The shorter TE (28 ms) was chosen for metabolite quantification, while the longest TE (144 ms) was chosen for the detection of lactate (Lac) whose signal can be hidden when a large lipid signal resonating at 1.28 ppm is also present. Automated shimming using the scanner software was sufficient to acquire good quality spectra (linewidth 9 ± 5 Hz, mean ± standard deviation), thus reducing the total acquisition time.

The water signal was suppressed by using a presequence composed by chemical selective saturation, CHESS, pulses followed by crusher gradients. Thirty-two excitations were sufficient to acquire metabolite spectra from voxels ranging between 2.7 and 6.2 mL with sufficient signal-to-noise-ratio. Unsuppressed water signal was acquired from the same voxel with the same parameters except for a reduced number of excitations (1 instead of 32).

The total scan time, including MRI and 1H-MRS, was about 28 min, with the latter lasting less than 5 min.

Data analysis

Spectra were analysed using LCModel fitting routine that calculates the best fit to the experimental spectrum as a linear combination of model spectra (i.e., metabolite solutions) [23]. Seventeen metabolites were included in the basis set: alanine (Ala), aspartate (Asp), creatine (Cr), glucose (Glc), glutamate (Glu), glutamine (Gln), glutathione (GSH), glycine (Glyc), glycerophosphorylcholine (GPC), phosphorylcholine (PCho), myoinositol (Ins), Lac, N-acetylaspartate (NAA), N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG), phosphocreatine (PCr), scyllo-inositol and taurine (Tau). Spectra of lipids and macromolecules were also included in the basis set. The J-coupling modulation experienced by Ins, Glu, and Gln signals was automatically accounted for in the LCModel basis sets. Only metabolites that were estimated to have Cramer-Rao lower bounds lower than 20%, which corresponded to an estimated concentration error lower than 0.2 μmol/g, were included in the quantitative analysis. In some cases, metabolites with overlapping or very close resonance are given as their sum (for example tCho = GPC + PCho and Glx = Glu + Gln).

The present protocol refers the metabolite signal intensity to the water signal. Corrections for the number of protons present in each resonance, assuming an 80% water concentration, are also included and allows for a reasonable estimation in mmol/L (mM units) [24]. The complete quantitative protocol should also include the measurements of T2 and T1 relaxation times, but the necessity to reduce acquisition time as much as possible during patient analyses made it preferable to have a rough estimate for metabolite quantification.

Histopathology

Before MRI/1H-MRS examination, all patients underwent cervical biopsy for diagnostic purposes, and we reported histopathologic subtype and grading for each lesion. Indeed, despite the small amount of tissue analysed, haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were blindly reviewed by two pathologists in order to provide additional information that could correlate with the radiological features. A complete histological assessment of each lesion was performed, which included the presence of necrosis, haemorrhages, desmoplasia, lymph vascular invasion, and finally the presence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes.

Statistical analysis

Statistical spectral analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney U test (Matlab R2021b) and p values lower than 0.05 were considered significant. The power analysis was performed with G-power 3.1.9.7 software (https://www.psychologie.hhu.de/arbeitsgruppen/allgemeine-psychologie-und-arbeitspsychologie/gpower) (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Results

Patients

Seventeen patients with histologically proven CC were included in the study. Of these, eleven were staged at baseline MRI as LACC and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy; the remaining six were directly managed with radical surgery. Five of eleven were excluded from subsequent analyses (three were lost to follow-up and two had a nondiagnostic spectrum because of a signal-to-noise ratio < 4). Thus, our final sample consisted of six patients, of whom three were GR and three PR-or-NR.

Patients’ mean age was 54.8 ± 16.3 years (mean ± standard deviation). Maximum tumour diameter was 75.0 ± 13.4 mm (mean ± standard deviation). Four patients had squamous tumour histotype, and two had adenocarcinoma. Concerning tumour grading, five were grade G2, and only one is grade G3; four had positive pelvic lymph nodes on MRI (FIGO 2018 stage IIIc1r). A summary of patients’ characteristics is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Patients’ characteristics
Full size table

Spectral analysis

In the spectra obtained from our uterine cervical tumours, it was possible to identify the signals of Glx, m-Ins, tCho, tCr, NAA, Ala, Lac, and Lip, as shown in Fig. 1a. Quantification was obtained for those metabolites who satisfy the condition of Cramer-Rao lower bounds less than 20% and therefore for tCho, Glx, NAA, and Lip. Short TE (28 ms) spectra presented a different metabolic pattern in the two populations GR and NR/PR. In particular, as a first result, we observed that the mean Lip value in GR patients (100 ± 50 mM) was significantly lower than in PR-or-NR patients (270 ± 50 mM) (p = 0.040). Representative spectra are shown in Fig. 1a (low lipid level, L) and Fig. 1d (high lipid level, H). Long TE (144 ms) spectra analysis showed absence or low level of Lac at 1.3 ppm, thus excluding lipid overestimation in the quantitative analysis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative spectra (echo time 30 ms) of the two groups: (a) low and (d) high lipid level, corresponding to good responder patients (GR) and partial or nonresponder patients (PR-or-NR), respectively. Peak assignments: Glx, Glutamine plus glutamate; m-Ins, Myo-inositol; tCho, GPC plus PCho or total choline; tCr, Creatine plus phosphocreatine; Ala, Alanine; Lip, Lipids; Lac, Lactate. T2-weighted paraaxial (b, e) and sagittal (c, f) images of the two cases

Full size image

Moreover, a significant difference was also observed in tCho distribution. In the GR group, the mean tCho peak value (4.2 ± 1.9 mM) was significantly higher than in the PR-or-NR group (1.8 ± 0.4 mM) (p = 0.040). Finally, we also observed a significant difference in the Lip/tCho ratio with higher values in PR-or-NR patients (30 ± 20) than in GR patients (160 ± 60) (p = 0.040). Figure 2 shows the box plots of the signals of Lip (a), tCho (b) and of the ratio Lip/tCho (c), and Table 3 summarises the data obtained.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Boxplot of lipid signal, resonating at 1.3 ppm (a) total choline (tCho) signal (b) and lipids/tCho (Lip/tCho) ratio (c) in the two groups: good responder patients (GR) on the left and partial or nonresponder patients (PR-or-NR) on the right

Full size image
Table 3 In vivo quantitative 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy determinations of metabolite concentrations in spectra of high (H, n = 3) and low or intermediate lipid content (L, n = 3) in uterine cervical cancers
Full size table

No significant correlation was observed between spectral pattern and clinical and histological data, in particular, Lip, tCho, and Lip/tCho values did not show significant differences when varying age, tumour diameter, histotype, grading, and lymph nodes’ presence on MRI.

Discussion

As observed in our study, 1H-MR spectroscopy at 3.0 T can be successfully used to probe the molecular profile of uterine cervical tumours in vivo. The use of 32-channel receiver coil made it possible to obtain in vivo spectra from the tumour in a reasonable time (less than 5 min).

By acquiring short TE spectra (TE = 30 ms), we detected and quantified lipid resonances (the triglyceride methylene −CH2 signal resonating at 1.28 ppm and the methyl −CH3 signal resonating at 0.9 ppm) in all our tumours. Previous studies performed on patients or on ex vivo biopsies used alterations in fatty acid metabolism to discriminate between preinvasive and invasive tumours or to differentiate between cancer and healthy control groups [20, 25, 26].

Lipids are a group of biomolecules that constitute the structural basis of biological membranes and function as energy source and signalling molecules [27]. Many roads lead to lipid accumulation in cancer, and metabolic reprogramming is one of them, which has been widely observed during cancer development to confer cancer cells the ability to survive and proliferate. Together with the well-known ‘Warburg effect’ (aerobic glycolysis, even when the ambient oxygen supply is sufficient), deregulated anabolism/catabolism of fatty acids and amino acids (mainly glutamine, serine, and glycine) has been identified to support cancer cell growth [28]. Tumour cells prefer the fatty acid oxidation pathway as a source of energy, which can come from either external or newly formed fatty acids, which are oxidised and stored as lipid droplets in the tissue. Fatty acid oxidation has been proven to protects cancer cells from treatment induced apoptosis by increasing mitochondrial membrane lipids [29].

Previous studies applied ex vivo1H-MRS to CC biopsies at 8.5 T and detected differences in lipid signal with both single voxel techniques and chemical shift microimaging [25, 30]. The authors could clearly distinguish preinvasive from invasive cancer evaluating the intensity of the lipid signal (detected by single voxel 1H-MRS) or on the intensity of the bright spot obtained in the lipid maps of chemical shift microimaging of the biopsies. The higher lipid level was found in the invasive cancers. Moreover, a recent in vivo study performed at 7 T on uterine CC identified poorly differentiated tumours because they showed elevated ratios between two fatty acid groups (the first composed by α-carboxyl and α-olefinic groups resonating at about 2.1 ppm over the methyl group resonating at 1.3 ppm) when compared with the well-differentiated tumour or normal tissue [18]. In other words, more unsaturated fatty acids were found in poorly differentiated tumours. These results are in agreement with previous published MRS studies at lower magnetic field strengths, where fatty acid signals were observed in uterine CC [17,18,19,20,21,22].

Unfortunately, 7-T system which allow the distinction of the lipid resonances at 2.1 ppm from other metabolites (such as Glx or NAA) are not common in clinical settings, making this application limited to few research institutes. Our quantitative protocol, which resemble an absolute quantification (except for the eventual T1 alterations), can be widely applied and the results can be compared to different centres with different systems. The limitation of using the methylene 1.28 ppm peak for lipid quantification may cause lipid overestimation as it overlaps with the methyl resonance of lactate, which also appears at 1.3 ppm and could be present in tumours. In our protocol, we added an extra acquisition at longer TE (144 ms) in order to detect (as a negative doublet) and eventually quantify the presence of lactate. In our spectra, Lac have been observed in only few spectra and in these in a small amount.

The tCho peak has also been considered in previous studies for discrimination between benign and malignant cervical lesions with contradicting results [17]. It includes the complex of choline compounds (choline, PCho, and glycerophosphocholine) and has been found elevated in several tumours. In fact, aberrant choline metabolism, characterised by an increase in total choline-containing compounds, is a metabolic hallmark of carcinogenesis and tumour progression. It arises from alterations in the metabolic enzymes that control the biosynthesis and catabolism of phosphatidylcholine. As a result of these metabolic changes, high PCho and tCho content is often observed in actively growing tumours. With limitations due to poor sensitivity, tCho have been identified as diagnostic biomarkers of malignancy in prostate, breast and brain cancer and as predictors of tumour aggressiveness in breast cancer [31,32,33,34]. These authors found an association of tCho levels with higher grading, higher Ki-67 value and large-sized lesions. They also found a significant association between the presence of tCho and the absence of central necrosis. Although limited to a small number of patients, our data show an increase in tCho in GR patients and may suggest an inverse correlation between lipids and tCho. All these data are in agreement with a better response of low-necrosis and therefore better-perfused tumours, as previously assessed in other gynaecological cancers [9]. Other signals were also present in our sample of CC (i.e., Glx and, in some cases, NAA) but their quantification did not reveal differences that could predict a favourable prognosis.

Notably, 1H-MRS is a noninvasive method and it is easily accessible to several centres using a well-tolerated procedure, and the addition of spectroscopy sequences to the standard MRI protocol led to an average time extension of a few minutes, which would not negatively affect clinical practice.

Our study had limitations. The first is the very limited number of patients included in the quantitative analysis. Nevertheless, power analysis confirmed that, because of the substantial difference found between the Lip signal values of GR and PR-or-NR, the number of patients analysed is sufficient to obtain significant and encouraging results in this preliminary study (Supplementary Fig. 1). Further analysis with a large cohort of patients is warranted. Second, our data are based on tumour lesions larger than 58 mm, a size that ensures that analysed volumes completely cover the entire tumour volume. Uterine CCs of this size can be heterogeneous, but MRS provides an average signal arising from the entire voxel. Moreover, application of the quantitative protocol should ensure detection of high lipid content even if this amount does not come from the entire volume, suggesting the presence of nonresponder-like regions within the tumours.

In conclusion, our data showed the ability to noninvasively detect and quantify lipid profiles in CCs by using 1H-MRS at a magnetic field widely used in clinical settings (3 T). For the first time, it was observed that lipid level could be associated with tumour prognosis (the higher the lipid signal, the worse the prognosis). In vivo1H-MRS may have the potential as a prognostic factor of CC in a noninvasive manner to help clinical management.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

1H-MRS:

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Ala:

Alanine

CC:

Cervical cancer

FIGO:

International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Gln:

Glutamine

Glu:

Glutamate

Glx:

Glu + Gln

GPC:

Glycerophosphorylcholine

GR:

Good responders

Ins:

Myo-inositol

Lac:

Lactate

LACC:

Locally advanced cervical cancer

Lip:

Lipids

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NAA:

N-acetylaspartate

PCho:

Phosphorylcholine

PR-or-NR:

Poor responders or nonresponders

tCho:

Total choline (i.e. GPC+PCho)

TE:

Echo time

References

  1. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L et al (2020) Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health 8:e191–e203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brisson M, Kim JJ, Canfell K et al (2020) Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Lancet 395:575–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30068-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M et al (2019) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet 145:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ye Q, Yang Y, Tang X, Li J, Li X, Zhang Y (2020) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) in patients with stage IB2, IIA, or IIB cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Markers 2020:7415056. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7415056

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Manganaro L, Lakhman Y, Bharwani N et al (2021) Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: updated guidelines of the European society of urogenital radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018. Eur Radiol 31:7802–7816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07632-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Merz J, Bossart M, Bamberg F, Eisenblaetter M (2020) Revised FIGO staging for cervical cancer – a new role for MRI. Rofo 192:937–944. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1198-5729

  8. Richenberg J, Løgager V, Panebianco V, Rouviere O, Villeirs G, Schoots IG (2019) The primacy of multiparametric MRI in men with suspected prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 29:6940–6952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06166-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Satta S, Dolciami M, Celli V et al (2021) Quantitative diffusion and perfusion MRI in the evaluation of endometrial cancer: validation with histopathological parameters. Br J Radiol 94:20210054. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210054

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. García Figueiras R, Baleato González S, Padhani AR et al (2015) Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in oncology: the fingerprints of cancer? Diagn Interv Radiol 22:75–89. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2015.15009

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rapalino O, Ratai EM (2016) Multiparametric imaging analysis. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 24:671–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2016.06.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Martín Noguerol T, Sánchez-González J, Martínez Barbero JP, García-Figueiras R, Baleato-González S, Luna A (2016) Clinical imaging of tumor metabolism with 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 24:57–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2015.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fardanesh R, Marino MA, Avendano D, Leithner D, Pinker K, Thakur SB (2019) Proton MR spectroscopy in the breast: technical innovations and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 50:1033–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26700

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Villeirs GM, Oosterlinck W, Vanherreweghe E, De Meerleer GO (2010) A qualitative approach to combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 73:352–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morita N, Harada M, Otsuka H, Melhem ER, Nishitani H (2010) Clinical application of MR spectroscopy and imaging of brain tumor. Magn Reson Med Sci 9:167–175. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.9.167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Allen JR, Prost RW, Griffith OW, Erickson SJ, Erickson BA (2001) In vivo proton (H1) magnetic resonance spectroscopy for cervical carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 24:522–529. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-200110000-00021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Booth S, Pickles M, Turnbull L (2009) In vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy of gynaecological tumours at 3.0 Tesla. BJOG 116:300–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02007.x

  18. Arteaga de Castro CS, Hoogendam JP, van Kalleveen IML et al (2019) Proton MRS of cervical cancer at 7 T. NMR Biomed 32:e4015. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma FH, Qiang JW, Cai SQ, Zhao SH, Zhang GF, Rao YM (2015) MR spectroscopy for differentiating benign from malignant solid adnexal tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:W724–W730. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13391

  20. Mahon MM, Cox IJ, Dina R et al (2004) 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of preinvasive and invasive cervical cancer: in vivo-ex vivo profiles and effect of tumor load. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:356–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Harry VN (2010) Novel imaging techniques as response biomarkers in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.11.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rizzo S, Buscarino V, Origgi D et al (2016) Evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and MR spectroscopy (MRS) as early response biomarkers in cervical cancer patients. Radiol Med 121:838–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0665-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Provencher SW (1993) Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn Reson Med 30:672–679. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910300604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Canese R, Pisanu ME, Mezzanzanica D et al (2012) Characterisation of in vivo ovarian cancer models by quantitative 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging. NMR Biomed 25:632–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Delikatny EJ, Russell P, Hunter JC et al (1993) Proton MR and human cervical neoplasia: ex vivo spectroscopy allows distinction of invasive carcinoma of the cervix from carcinoma in situ and other preinvasive lesions. Radiology 188:791–796. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.188.3.8351349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mahon MM, Williams AD, Soutter WP et al (2004) 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of invasive cervical cancer: an in vivo study with ex vivo corroboration. NMR Biomed 17:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Snaebjornsson MT, Janaki-Raman S, Schulze A (2020) Greasing the wheels of the cancer machine: the role of lipid metabolism in cancer. Cell Metab 31:62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.11.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li Z, Zhang H (2016) Reprogramming of glucose, fatty acid and amino acid metabolism for cancer progression. Cell Mol Life Sci 73:377–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-015-2070-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li YJ, Fahrmann JF, Aftabizadeh M et al (2022) Fatty acid oxidation protects cancer cells from apoptosis by increasing mitochondrial membrane lipids. Cell Rep 39:110870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110870

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kunnecke B, Delikatny EJ, Russell P, Hunter JC, Mountford CE (1994) Proton magnetic resonance and human cervical neoplasia. J Magn Reson B 104:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmrb.1994.1066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Glunde K, Bhujwalla ZM, Ronen SM (2011) Choline metabolism in malignant transformation. Nat Rev Cancer 11:835–848. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharma U, Jagannathan NR (2019) In vivo MR spectroscopy for breast cancer diagnosis. BJR|Open 1:20180040. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20180040

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Julià-Sapé M, Candiota AP, Arús C (2019) Cancer metabolism in a snapshot: MRS(I). NMR Biomed 32. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4054

  34. Galati F, Luciani ML, Caramanico C, Moffa G, Catalano C, Pediconi F (2019) Breast magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 T in biopsy-proven breast cancers: does choline peak correlate with prognostic factors? Invest Radiol 54:767–773. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Miriam Dolciami, Angelina Pernazza, Carlo Della Rocca, Carlo Catalano & Lucia Manganaro

  2. Core Facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy

    Rossella Canese

  3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Claudia Testa

  4. Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Hospital, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Giusi Santangelo & Innocenza Palaia

Authors
  1. Miriam Dolciami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rossella Canese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Claudia Testa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Angelina Pernazza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giusi Santangelo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Innocenza Palaia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Carlo Della Rocca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Carlo Catalano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lucia Manganaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MD contributed substantially to the conception and design of the study, image acquisitions, data interpretation, and draft and revisions of the work; RC contributed substantially to the conception and design of the study, image acquisitions, data interpretation, and draft and revisions of the work; CT contributed substantially to the conception and design of the study, data interpretation, and revisions of the work; AP contributed substantially to data acquisitions and interpretations, and revisions of the work; GS contributed substantially to the data acquisitions and interpretations, and revisions of the work; IP contributed substantially to the data acquisitions and interpretations, and revisions of the work; CDR contributed substantially to the data acquisitions and interpretations, and revisions of the work; CC contributed substantially to the image acquisitions, data interpretation, and revisions of the work; LM contributed substantially to the conception and design of the study, image acquisitions, data interpretation, and revisions of the work. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rossella Canese.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Departmental Ethical Committee of the Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences of AOU Policlinico Umberto I (protocol no. AR11916B865B78D2, 24/06/2019). Written informed consent was obtained from all individuals before participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Power analysis (or sample size calculation) for the Mann-Whitney test of the lipid signal.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dolciami, M., Canese, R., Testa, C. et al. The contribution of the 1H-MRS lipid signal to cervical cancer prognosis: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol Exp 6, 47 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00300-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00300-1

Keywords