Skip to main content
European Radiology Experimental
Download PDF

123I-FP-CIT SPECT validation of nigro-putaminal MRI tractography in dementia with Lewy bodies

European Radiology Experimental volume 4, Article number: 27 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Assessment of nigrostriatal degeneration is a key element to discriminate between dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Alzheimer disease (AD), and it is often evaluated using ioflupane (123I-FP-CIT) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Given the limited availability of 123I-FP-CIT SPECT, we evaluated if a mask-based approach to nigroputaminal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion-weighted tractography could be able to capture microstructural changes reflecting nigroputaminal degeneration in DLB.

Methods

A nigroputaminal bundle mask was delineated on 12 healthy volunteers (HV) and applied to MRI diffusion-weighted data of 18 subjects with DLB, 21 subjects with AD and another group of 12 HV. The correlation between nigroputaminal fractional anisotropy (FA) values and 123I-FP-CIT SPECT findings was investigated. Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA, ANCOVA, and parametric correlation statistics as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used.

Results

DLB patients showed a higher nigroputaminal FA values compared with both AD and HV-controls groups (p = 0.001 for both comparisons), while no difference was observed between HV-controls and AD groups (p = 0.450); at ROC analysis, the area under the curve for the discriminating DLB and AD subjects was 0.820; FA values correlated with 123I-FP-CIT values (on the left, r = -0.670; on the right, r = -720). No significant differences were observed for the FA of the corticospinal tract across the three groups (p = 0.740).

Conclusions

In DLB, nigroputaminal degeneration could be reliably assessed on MRI diffusion scans using a mask of nigroputaminal bundle trajectory. Nigroputaminal FA in DLB patients correlated with 123I-FP-CIT values data may allow to differentiate these patients from AD patients and HV-controls.

Key points

  • Distinction of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) from the Alzheimer disease is the most common problem during DLB work-up.

  • Magnetic resonance imaging diffusion-weighted techniques studying the nigrostriatal tracts in the Parkinson disease revealed conflicting results.

  • 123I-FP-CIT single-photon emission computed tomography is a currently accepted indicative biomarker for DLB diagnosis.

  • Diffusion-weighted MRI may capture nigroputaminal microstructural changes in DLB patients.

Background

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) represents the second most frequent dementing illness in subjects aged 65 years and above [1]. While DLB differential diagnosis is quite broad, its distinction from Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common problem during DLB work-up [2, 3]. To help in this differential diagnosis, dopamine transporter (DAT) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with 123I-FP-CIT is to date the best standardised technique [3, 4], and it is included in current DLB diagnostic criteria as an indicative biomarker [1]. The rationale of this approach lies on the degeneration of the nigrostriatal pathway in DLB but not in AD which 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT captures as a reduction of radiopharmaceutical specific binding ratio.

Fibre tractography represents an analysis approach to diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data used to identify specific white matter tracts [5]. Calculation of diffusion-related metrics within the identified tracts can then assess tissue microstructure and could be able to capture nigrostriatal degeneration. Using tractography, however, the identification of the nigrostriatal pathway is not straightforward, as nigrostriatal fibres are mainly unmyelinated and their trajectories are curved [6]. Indeed, the use of diffusion-weighted MRI techniques to study the nigrostriatal tracts in healthy controls and in movement disorders such as the Parkinson disease (PD) has revealed conflicting results. For example, nigrostriatal fractional anisotropy (FA) has been reported to be increased [7], decreased [8], or unchanged [9] in PD patients compared to controls. Scant evidence, moreover, is available regarding the use of tractography to study the nigrostriatal pathway in DLB.

Here, we decided to evaluate nigroputaminal (NP) white matter integrity in DLB patients compared to AD and controls and to take advantage of the inclusion of 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT imaging in the DLB work-up to use it to validate NP tractography results.

Methods

DLB and AD patients

In this study, we recruited 18 subjects with a diagnosis of DLB, aged 77.0 ± 1.1 years (mean ± standard deviation), 8 males and 9 females, with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 25.7 ± 2.1 (Table 1) according to current criteria [1] and 21 subjects with a diagnosis of mild AD dementia, aged 76.4 ± 1.0, 9 males and 12 females, with a MMSE score of 25.9 ± 2.3 (Table 1) according to the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association criteria [10].

Table 1 Demographic and neuropsychological features of patients and controls
Full size table

All subjects were enrolled from a tertiary referral centre among those presenting with a differential diagnosis between DLB and AD and who underwent clinical and neuropsychological testing, brain MRI and 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT imaging during their work-up. Moreover, all subjects underwent a brain 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scan during their clinical work-up. Subjects presenting with a normal 18F-FDG-PET scan or an anterior pattern of hypo-metabolism were considered not to be eligible, while all subjects presented with a posterior pattern of hypo-metabolism felt to be possibly affected with AD or DLB. Details on the 18F-FDG-PET acquisition were reported elsewhere [11]. To be included in the study, subjects needed to present clearly positive or negative 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT scan (i.e., evidence of nigrostriatal degeneration for all DLB subjects and for none of the AD subjects based on normative data [12]) performed no later than 6 months after the first access to our centre and to have a clinical follow-up of at least 3 years after the 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT scan confirming the baseline clinical diagnosis.

To the purpose of this study, only diffusion MRI and 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT data were taken into account. Subjects with neurological, psychiatric or major medical co-morbidities, as well as with a MMSE total score of less than 23, were considered not eligible for the study. MMSE, clinical dementia rating scale sum of boxes [13] and instrumental activities of daily living lost [14] are reported in Table 1. Furthermore, the presence of a vascular burden was excluded by the use of the Fazekas scale [moderate/severe] as an exclusion criterion.

Healthy controls

We recruited two groups, each of them composed of 12 healthy volunteers (HV), matched for age and sex with the two patient groups, respectively:

  1. i.

    To identify the NP tract (HV-tractography group, aged 76.1 ± 1.5 years, 5 males, 7 females) by using tractography or

  2. ii.

    To be used as a control group (HV-controls, aged 75.4 ± 1.6, 6 males, 6 females) in the comparison of NP diffusion metrics between AD and DLB subjects as described below.

All controls, recruited from the non-consanguineous relatives of the AD and DLB patients, were free from relevant pathologies and presented with a normal neurological examination, brief cognitive examination and brain MRI scan. Healthy volunteers did not undergo 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT imaging for radioprotection concerns and given the availability of published multicentre normative data for 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT [12].

MRI protocol

MRI was performed with a 1.5-T scanner (Signa HDxt; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with an eight-channel transmit-receive head coil. The protocol included diffusion data and a volumetric T1-weighted sequence (coronal three-dimensional spoiled gradient recalled sequence, with repetition time 10.0 ms, echo time 4.5 ms, flip angle 8°, field of view 24 × 24 cm2 and matrix 256 × 256).

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was performed using an axial single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence (repetition time 13,700 ms, echo time 90 ms, flip angle 90°, field of view 24 × 24 cm2 and matrix 96 × 96), with diffusion gradients applied in 61 non-collinear directions (b value = 1,000 s/mm2) and six b = 0 images for the HV-tractography group. The aim of this sequence was to identify the NP bundle in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space as described below. All other subjects (AD, DLB, HV-controls) were scanned using a DWI sequence with 15 non-collinear directions (b value = 1,000 s/mm2) and two b = 0 images. Thus, the presence of any differences in diffusion metrics between HV-controls and patients were assessed using images acquired with the same sequence. While all images were collected on the same scanner, the differences in the DWI protocol between the HV-tractography group and all other subjects are due to the fact that the images for the DLB and AD patients were acquired as part of clinical work-up MRI exam. However, all DLB and AD subjects and all HV-controls subjects underwent the same diffusion MRI protocol with 15 directions described above.

123I-FP-CIT SPECT acquisition and analysis

For all AD and DLB subjects, 123I-FP-CIT SPECT data was acquired by means of a two-headed Millennium VG camera (General Electric Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) and analysed using the BasGan algorithm [15]. Acquisition started between 180 and 240 min after injection of 123I-FP-CIT and lasted 40 min. A “step-and-shoot” protocol was applied with a radius of rotation < 15 cm, and 120 projections evenly spaced over 360° were generated. Total counts ranged between 2.5 and 3 million. The pixel size of the acquisition matrix was 2.4 mm, thanks to an electronic zoom (zoom factor 1.8) applied in the data collection phase. In the reconstruction phase, also a digital zoom was used and the resulting images were sampled by isotropic voxels with 2.33 mm sides. Projections were processed by means of the ordered subsets expectation maximisation (OSEM) algorithm (8 iterations, 10 subsets) followed by post filtering (three-dimensional Gaussian filter with full width-half maximum = 8 mm). The OSEM algorithm included a proback pair accounting for collimator blur and photon attenuation. No compensation for scatter was performed. The two-dimensional + 1 approximation was applied in the simulation of the space-variant collimator blur, whereas photon attenuation was modelled with the approximation of a linear coefficient uniform inside the skull and equal to 0.11 cm−1. The reconstructed 123I-FP-CIT SPECT images were exported in analysed format and processed by the automatic BasGan algorithm version 2 based on a high definition, three-dimensional striatal template, derived from Talairach’s atlas [16, 17]. Using this approach, an optimisation protocol automatically performs fine adjustments in the positioning of blurred templates to best match the radioactive counts and locates an occipital region of interest for background evaluation. Partial volume effect correction is included in the process of uptake computation of caudate, putamen and background. The partial volume effect correction performed by the method consists of an activity assignment in a Talairach-Tornoux atlas-based three-compartment model of basal ganglia. Background uptake was subtracted by putamen and caudate uptake as follows (caudate or putamen uptake − background uptake)/background uptake, to generate specific binding ratio (SBR) values. For this study, our metrics of interest were the putaminal SBR values.

Tractography

Data were analysed using FMRIB Software Library (FSL) (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/) and MRtrix (http://www.mrtrix.org) packages. For each subject of the HV-tractography group, we used constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) tractography to identify the NP.

Our pipeline for nigroputaminal tractography was as follows:

  1. i.

    Generation of track density imaging (TDI) maps. FSL [18] was used to perform eddy current corrections and brain extraction. Whole brain tractography was performed with MRtrix using an algorithm that combines CSD tractography with probabilistic tractography [19]. The relevant parameters were seed = whole brain, step-size = 0.1 mm, maximum angle between steps = 10°, maximum harmonics order = 8, and termination criteria: exit the brain or when the CSD fibre-orientation distribution amplitude was < 0.1 and generation of 2.5 million tracks. TDI map was created as the total number of tracks passing within each element of a user-defined super-resolution grid; for this study, a 1-mm grid was used. TDI maps have been shown to improve tractography results allowing a more precise visualisation of white matter tracts and tractography seed regions. TDI, for example, has been used to visualise brainstem nuclei (such as the red nucleus) [20], used for fibre tractography. In this study, TDI was used to verify the correct positioning of substantia nigra (SN) masks and to map tractography results in each individual subject native diffusion space.

  2. ii.

    Creation of SN and putamen nuclei masks. Masks for the left and right SN and putamen nuclei were generated in MNI space using the WFU atlas toolbox included in statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/). All the grey matter masks were registered from MNI space to each subject TDI maps using the nifty-reg software package [21]. To reach this aim, we co-registered each T1-weighted image to each subject native diffusion space, via the non-diffusion-weighted scans, using a linear transformation. We then used a non-linear transformation to co-register the MNI template brain to the native T1-weighted images, and then we concatenated the two transformations. The resulting transformation was then used to co-register the SN and putamen masks to each subject TDI image. The correct registration of each SN and putamen nuclei mask was then evaluated on TDI images and modified as needed to fit individual anatomy by a neurologist with more than 10 years of experience in neuroimaging and separately evaluated by a neuroradiologist with more than 15 years of experience in neuroimaging.

  3. iii.

    NP tractography. It was performed in MRtrix with an algorithm which combines CSD with probabilistic streamline tractography (parameters: step-size = 0.1 mm, maximum angle between steps = 10°, maximum harmonics order = 8, and termination criteria: CSD fibre-orientation distribution amplitude was < 0.1, number of tracks: 3,000). Tractography algorithms, performed separately for the left and right NP tract used the TDI-registered SN and putamen nucleus masks as seed and target points. Resulting tracts were then mapped back to TDI images.

  4. iv.

    NP mask population mask. The resulting tracts were translated into 1 × 1 × 1 MNI space using the non-linear registration function of the nifty-reg software package [21]. To reduce the possibility of including false-positive tracings, given the probabilistic nature of fibre tractography, but to allow for the natural variability of such a small pathway, we included in our final NP masks only those fibres’ reliability traced in at least 50% of healthy controls.

  5. v.

    Registration of NP masks to native diffusion space and extraction of FA and mean diffusivity values. Nifty-reg was then used for each subject in the DLB, AD and HV-controls groups. The bilateral corticospinal tract (CST) mask, included in FSL, was used as a control region (Fig. 1). Regarding the registration of the NP bundle mask to each patient, two separate sets of analyses were performed, one using a non-linear registration approach (main results) and another using only a linear registration (confirmatory results).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Bilateral corticospinal tract mask (in red) used as a control region

Full size image

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 23 (IBM; version 23.0). As preliminary analysis, a Shapiro-Wilk test was used to confirm the normality of the data. We then used both an ANOVA and an ANCOVA corrected for age and sex to evaluate group differences, parametric correlations to correlate DWI metrics with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT results and to calculate the DLB versus AD receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) based on the tractography results. All analyses were repeated after bootstrapping with 3,000 permutations.

Results

Differences in diffusion metrics

Demographic and clinical characteristics of AD, DLB and HV-controls are reported in Table 1. NP tractography results are shown in Fig. 2. NP FA values (average value of left and right NP tracts) were as follows: DLB, 0.500 ± 0.030; AD, 0.430 ± 0.040, and HV-controls, 0.420 ± 0.040 (Table 2). There was an overall group effect for FA (F = 14.1; p < 0.001) which remained significant correcting for age and sex (p = 0.002).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Left and right nigroputaminal tractography results (in red)

Full size image
Table 2 Diffusion metrics (fractional anisotropy) values of nigroputaminal and corticospinal tracts across patients and controls
Full size table

Patients in the DLB group presented with higher FA values compared with both AD and HV-controls groups (DLB vs HV-controls p = 0.001 [effect size d = 1.9, representing a large effect size]; DLB versus AD p = 0.001 [effect size d = 1.5, representing a large effect size]) in the NP masks, while there was no difference in NP FA between HV-controls and AD groups (p = 0.450). Based on these data, a ROC analysis was run; the area under the curve (AUC) for the discrimination of DLB and AD subjects based on NP FA values was 0.820 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the discrimination between dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer disease patients based on nigroputaminal fractional anisotropy values. The observed area under the curve value is 0.820

Full size image

Inside the CST mask, there was no significant difference in FA or MD values between the three groups (DLB 0.530 ± 0.040, AD 0.520 ± 0.040, HV-controls 0.530 ± 0.030) (Table 2). There was no significant group effect for NP or CST MD values (p = 0.740).

Correlation between NP diffusion metrics and 123I-FP-CIT SPECT values

Putaminal 123I-FP-CIT SPECT SBR values were 1.300 ± 0.410 and 1.260 ± 0.310 for the left and right putamen in the DLB group and 3.300 ± 0.890 and 3.000 ± 0.610 for the AD group. As per protocol, all DLB subjects and none of the AD subjects presented with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT SBR values suggestive of NP degeneration based on multicentre normative data [11]. Focusing on the DLB group, there was a significant inverse correlation between 123I-FP-CIT SPECT putamen SBR values and NP FA values (left, r = -0.670, p = 0.003; right, r = -0.720, p = 0.001; Fig. 4). There was no correlation between FA values inside the CST mask and 123I-FP-CIT SPECT putamen SBR values (left, p = 0.560; right, p = 0.450).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Correlations between putaminal 123IFP-CIT specific binding ratio (SBR) values and nigroputaminal (NP) fractional anisotropy (FA) in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies. Note the significant (right, r = -0.720, p = 0.001; left, r = -0.670, p = 0.003) inverse correlation between putaminal SBR values at 123IFP-CIT

Full size image

Supplementary results

All analyses were re-run using a linear transformation to co-register the NP mask to each subject native diffusion space. There was no material difference in the results compared to those reported in the main analysis. NP FA values (average value of left and right NP tracts) were DLB 0.510 ± 0.030 (DLB), 0.440 ± 0.030 (AD) and 0.430 ± 0.040 (HV).

Discussion

Here, we showed that diffusion-weighted MRI captures NP microstructural changes in DLB patients and thus could represent a useful approach to help in the differential diagnosis between DLB and AD. The finding of increased NP FA values in the DLB group should be interpreted in the context of two key anatomical features of the NP pathway, i.e, the presence of unmyelinated dopaminergic fibres (and thus their low FA values) and the presence of crossing fibres along its trajectory [22, 23] as well as the relative selective loss of NP fibres in DLB compared to AD.

In Huntington disease patients [22], selective loss of cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical fibres has been shown to lead to an FA increase in fronto-striatal white matter regions rich in crossing fibres. Similar regional findings of increased FA values in crossing fibre regions due to white matter fibre loss were also observed in multiple sclerosis [24] and in ageing [23]. In voxels rich in crossing fibres, the selective reduction of one of the fibre populations (and thus reduction of fibre dispersion) could lead to an increase in intravoxel FA, as observed in our study. This interpretation is in line with the key methodological facet of this study, i.e., the use of a separate population of healthy controls to create a map of the NP fibre trajectory as opposed to identify the NP tract for each patient individually. Obviously, the mask-based approach provides information about the NP tracts’ macrostructural anatomy that are representatives of the mean values of the entire cohort of healthy subjects and not of DLB patients at an individual level. While this approach is free from the effect on probabilistic tractography of regional damage, it does not completely control (despite the use of a non-linear registration approach) for differences in regional atrophy [25]. Indeed, tractography analysis performed on images obtained by DLB patients may be affected by the structural degeneration of the NP tracts, thus reducing its reliability [26]. Future studies are needed to integrate the simple mask-based approach with a more detailed characterisation of the nigrostriatal system, based on graph-theory and including all the relevant grey matter regions and the connecting tracts.

It is not straightforward to compare our results with published data on nigrostriatal tractography in subjects with PD, given the differences in the target study population, the inclusion of AD patients in this study and our mask-based analysis approach. Moreover, the results of nigrostriatal tractography in PD are heterogeneous as nigrostriatal FA values in PD have been reported to be increased [27], decreased [8] or similar [9] of those of controls, and the same inconsistency of results has been reported for other metrics such as fibre density.

The heterogeneous nature of PD (for example regarding the motor phenotype) could at least partly explain these differences [28]. Another possible explanation may rely on the different pathological stages (from Lewy bodies’ formation to the final neuronal and axonal loss) of the neurodegenerative process affecting the NP tract at the time of MRI microstructural analysis [29]. Furthermore, FA is not able to reflect the specific pathological changes of the NP pathway. For example, a decrease in FA values may be due to the neurite density reduction, to an increase in the dispersion of neurite orientation distribution or demyelination.

A recent study [9], in which neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) have been used to evaluate the intracellular volume fraction and the orientation dispersion index in a cohort of PD patients, demonstrated a decrease in neurite density in the distal part of NP tract. This finding, consistent with histopathological studies suggesting that the degeneration in PD begins from the presynaptic terminals and the distal axons, may further suggest that different microstructural changes in different parts of the NP pathway at different time points characterise the neurodegenerative process, thus partly explain the conflicting results reported in the literature.

Despite the proof-of-concept nature of the current study, we run an exploratory ROC analysis of the potential of tractography to be used to differentiate between DLB and AD, showing good AUC values. Caution, however, is needed in the interpretation these ROC data given the nature of the DLB and AD subjects included here: small groups, the use of 123I-FP-CIT results as inclusion criteria in the study, the exclusion of subjects with vascular lesions in the basal ganglia region and the availability of a long follow-up to confirm the baseline diagnoses.

A main limitation of this work is represented by the use of diffusion-weighted MRI acquired in clinical practice at 1.5 T. However, we feel that the use of a NP population mask, the lack of significant effect on the analysis by the registration protocol and the use of 123I-FP-CIT as reference allows us to be confident with the presented results. The combination of MRI and 123I-FP-CIT has been previously used in the literature to gather multi-modal information of neurodegeneration [23]. Indeed, 123IFP-CIT, a non-invasive imaging method, characterised by limited exposure to ionising radiation and high cost-effectiveness, is one among the indicative biomarkers for the diagnosis of DLB in the current diagnostic criteria [1]. Therefore, alternative imaging biomarkers of NP degeneration, such as tractography-derived metrics of microstructural damage cited above (NODDI), must be validated by using 123IFP-CIT as reference standard comparator. Thus, in this context, our findings suggest a possible approach to NP degeneration assessment and point to the usefulness of a combined MRI/molecular imaging approach to validate tractography results. To increase our confidence with the baseline clinical diagnosis, we included only those subjects with at least 3 years of clinical follow-up thus also explaining why MRI images were not acquired using an up-to-date clinical scanner.

Further investigations performed on larger samples and based on higher field and standardised MRI protocols and processing analysis are necessary to confirm our findings.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset used and/or analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

123IFP-CIT:

Ioflupane

AD:

Alzheimer disease

CSD:

Constrained spherical deconvolution

CST:

Corticospinal tract

DLB:

Dementia with Lewy bodies

FA:

Fractional anisotropy

HV:

Healthy volunteers

NODDI:

Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging

NP:

Nigroputaminal

OSEM:

Ordered subsets expectation maximisation algorithm

PD:

Parkinson’s disease

SBR:

Specific binding ratio

SN:

Substantia nigra

SPECT:

Single-photon emission computed tomography

TDI:

Track density imaging

References

  1. McKeith IG, Boeve BF, Dickson DW et al (2017) Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology 89:88–100. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004058

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. McKeith I, Mintzer J, Aarsland D et al (2004) Dementia with Lewy bodies. Lancet Neurol 3:19– 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00619-7

  3. Geser F, Wenning GK, Poewe W, McKeith I (2005) How to diagnose dementia with Lewy bodies: state of the art. Mov Disord 20:S11–S20. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McKeith I, O'Brien J, Walker Z et al (2007) Sensitivity and specificity of dopamine transporter imaging with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT in dementia with Lewy bodies: a phase III, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol 6:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70057-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johansen-Berg H, Behrens TE (2006) Just pretty pictures? What diffusion tractography can add in clinical neuroscience. Curr Opin Neurol 19:379–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wco.0000236618.82086.01

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Pritzel M, Sarter M, Morgan S, Huston JP (1983) Interhemispheric nigrostriatal projections in the rat: bifurcating nigral projections and loci of crossing in the diencephalon. Brain Res Bull 10:385–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-9230(83)90108-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cousineau M, Jodoin PM, Morency FC et al (2017) A test-retest study on Parkinson’s PPMI dataset yields statistically significant white matter fascicles. Neuroimage Clin 16:222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.07.020

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tan WQ, Yeoh CS, Rumpel H et al (2015) Deterministic tractography of the nigrostriatal-nigropallidal pathway in Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep 5:17283. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Andica C, Kamagata K, Hatano T et al (2018) Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the nigrostriatal pathway in Parkinson’s disease: retrograde degeneration observed by tract-profile analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 51:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.02.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H et al (2011) The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:263–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Morbelli S, Chincarini A, Brendel M et al (2019) Metabolic patterns across core features in dementia with Lewy bodies. Ann Neurol 85:715–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nobili F, Naseri M, De Carli F et al (2013) Automatic semi-quantification of [123I]FP-CIT SPECT scans in healthy volunteers using BasGan version 2: results from the ENC-DAT database. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40:565–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2304-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL (1982) A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 140:566–572. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.140.6.566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Poli GL, Bianchi C, Guerra UP (2013) Use of the BasGan algorithm for [123I]FP-CIT SPECT quantification: a phantom study. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 57:391–400

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Calvini P, Rodriguez G, Inguglia F, Mignone A, Guerra UP, Nobili F (2007) The basal ganglia matching tools package for striatal uptake semi-quantification: description and validation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:1240–1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0357-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Arnaldi D, De Carli F, Fama F et al (2017) Prediction of cognitive worsening in de novo Parkinson’s disease: clinical use of biomarkers. Mov Disord 32:1738–1747. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. (2012) FSL. Neuroimage 62:782–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015.

  19. Jeurissen B, Leemans A, Jones DK, Tournier JD, Sijbers J (2011) Probabilistic fiber tracking using the residual bootstrap with constrained spherical deconvolution. Hum Brain Mapp 32:461–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Palesi F, Tournier JD, Calamante F et al (2015) Contralateral cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathways with prominent involvement of associative areas in humans in vivo. Brain Strcut Funct 220:3369–3384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0861-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Modat M, Ridgway GR, Taylor ZA et al (2010) Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 98:278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Douaud G, Behrens TE, Poupon C et al (2009) In vivo evidence for the selective subcortical degeneration in Huntington’s disease. Neuroimage 46:958–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Furutani K, Harada M, Minato M, Morita N, Nishitani H (2005) Regional changes of fractional anisotropy with normal aging using statistical parametric mapping (SPM). J Med Invest 52:186–190. https://doi.org/10.2152/jmi.52.186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ciccarelli O, Werring DJ, Wheeler-Kingshott CA et al (2001) Investigation of MS normal-appearing brain using diffusion tensor MRI with clinical correlations. Neurology 56:926–933. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.56.7.926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Caligiuri ME, Arabia G, Barbagallo G et al (2017) Structural connectivity differences in essential tremor with and without resting tremor. J Neurol. 264:1865–1874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rubinov M, Sporns O (2010) Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 52:1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8553-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hikishima K, Ando K, Yano R et al (2015) Parkinson disease: diffusion MR imaging to detect nigrostriatal pathway loss in a Marmoset model treated with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine. Radiology 275:430–437. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14140601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ziegler E, Rouillard M, Andre E et al (2014) Mapping track density changes in nigrostriatal and extranigral pathways in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage 99:498–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jeong HS, Lee SR, Kim JE et al (2018) Brain structural changes in cynomolgus monkeys administered with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine: a longitudinal voxel-based morphometry and diffusion tensor imaging study. PLoS One 13:e0189804. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

MP acknowledges the support of the University of Genoa Curiosity grant. This work was developed within the framework of the DINOGMI Department of Excellence of MIUR 2018-2022 (232/2016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Matteo Pardini, Flavio Nobili, Dario Arnaldi, Gianluca Serafini, Caterina Lapucci, Mario Amore, Laura Bonzano & Giovanni Luigi Mancardi

  2. Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, Italy

    Matteo Pardini, Flavio Nobili, Dario Arnaldi, Roberto Rissotto, Carlo Serrati, Gianluca Serafini, Mario Amore & Davide Sassos

  3. Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Silvia Morbelli, Matteo Bauckneht & Luca Roccatagliata

  4. Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy

    Silvia Morbelli & Matteo Bauckneht

  5. Psychiatry Branch, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy

    Lucio Ghio

  6. Neurology Unit, Ospedale Antero Micone, Genoa, Italy

    Davide Massucco

  7. Department of Neuroradiology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, Italy

    Luca Roccatagliata

Authors
  1. Matteo Pardini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Flavio Nobili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dario Arnaldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Silvia Morbelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matteo Bauckneht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Roberto Rissotto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Carlo Serrati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gianluca Serafini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Caterina Lapucci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lucio Ghio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Mario Amore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Davide Massucco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Davide Sassos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Laura Bonzano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Giovanni Luigi Mancardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Luca Roccatagliata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the Disease Management Team on Dementia of the IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa

Contributions

MP conceptualised the study, performed the analysis, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. FN, DA, and RR interpreted the patient data regarding the cognitive disease. SM and MB performed nuclear imaging examination and extracted the data. CL contributed to writing the manuscript. CS, GS, LG, MA, DM, DS, GB, MB, and GLM revised the manuscript for intellectual content. LB performed MRI analysis and revised the manuscript. LR conceptualised the study, performed the MRI analysis and revised the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Roccatagliata.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Study procedure were approved by the ethical committee of Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS Genoa, Italy and all subjects and/or their legal representative gave an informed consent to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

All subjects and/or their legal representative gave an informed consent to public the results of the study.

Competing interests

MP receives research support from Novartis and received honoraria from Merck and Novartis.

FN has received fees for board participation by Roche and Eli-Lilly, and speaker honoraria from Eli-Lilly.

SM has received speaker honoraria from GE healthcare and Eli Lilly.

GLM has received honoraria for lecturing, travel expenses for attending meetings and financial support for research from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Sanofi Aventis, Teva, Genzyme, and Merck Serono Pharmaceuticals.

The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pardini, M., Nobili, F., Arnaldi, D. et al. 123I-FP-CIT SPECT validation of nigro-putaminal MRI tractography in dementia with Lewy bodies. Eur Radiol Exp 4, 27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-00153-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-00153-6

Keywords