Skip to main content
European Radiology Experimental

Table 2 This table provides full results of QualSyst quality assessment of included publications

From: The environmental impact of energy consumption and carbon emissions in radiology departments: a systematic review

  

Study

Criteria

Prasanna (2011) [35]

Esmaeili (2011) [34]

McCarthy (2014) [33]

Esmaeili (2015) [32]

Martin (2018) [31]

Esmaeili (2018) [30]

Brodbeck (2019) [29]

Alshqaqeeq (2020) [28]

Heye (2020) [14]

Hainc (2020) [13]

Büttner (2021) [18]

Peters (2021) [23]

McAlister (2022) [27]

Brown (2022) [26]

Gendy (2022) [24]

Woolen (2023) [25]

Question/objective sufficiently described?

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Study design evident and appropriate?

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

Context for the study clear?

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Connection to a theoretical framework/wider body of knowledge?

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Sampling strategy described, relevant, and justified?

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

Data collection methods clearly described and systematic?

2

1

1

1

1

1

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Data analysis clearly described and systematic?

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Use of verification procedure(s) to establish credibility?

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

2

2

1

2

Conclusions supported by the results?

1

1

2

2

1

2

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Reflexivity of the account?

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

Total (0–20)

18 (90%)

16 (80%)

17 (85%)

16 (80%)

14 (70%)

16 (80%)

10 (50%)

18 (90%)

20 (100%)

19 (95%)

17 (85%)

19 (95%)

20 (100%)

20 (100%)

18 (90%)

20 (100%)

Back to article page