Skip to main content

Table 1 Reader study scoring rubric

From: Synthetic interpolated DSA for radiation exposure reduction via gamma variate contrast flow modeling: a retrospective cohort study

Score

Description

Arterial phase

1. Uninterpretable

2. Severely deficient but interpretable

3. Moderately deficient but interpretable

4. Mildly deficient but interpretable

5. Perfect reproduction of reference

Large and small arteries visible and crossing arteries are distinct

1. Unusable for diagnosis

2. Small vessels not discernible; larger vessels not sharply defined

3. Fair vessel delineation; useful for diagnosis

4. Good vessel definition; small vessels visible

5. Excellent visualization of proximal through small distal vessels

Capillary phase

1. Uninterpretable

2. Severely deficient but interpretable

3. Moderately deficient but interpretable

4. Mildly deficient but interpretable

5. Perfect reproduction of reference

Capillary blush — assessment of contrast flow through capillary vessels

1. Unusable for diagnosis

2. Small vessels not discernible; larger vessels not sharply defined

3. Fair vessel delineation; useful for diagnosis

4. Good vessel definition; small vessels visible

5. Excellent visualization of proximal through small distal vessels

Venous phase

1. Uninterpretable

2. Severely deficient but interpretable

3. Moderately deficient but interpretable

4. Mildly deficient but interpretable

5. Perfect reproduction of reference

Venous vasculature visible and distinct

1. Unusable for diagnosis

2. Small vessels not discernible; larger vessels not sharply defined

3. Fair vessel delineation; useful for diagnosis

4. Good vessel definition; small vessels visible

5. Excellent visualization of proximal through small distal vessels

Overall imaging quality score

1. Desired anatomy/features not seen

2. Unacceptable quality

3. Limited quality

4. Adequate quality

5. Higher than needed quality

  1. The arterial, capillary, and venous phases of each sDSA were assigned a score from 1 to 5 using the Subjective Imaging Grading Scale as adapted from [4]. Following this, an overall Imaging Quality Score from 1 to 5 was also assigned describing the overall quality of the entire sDSA as adapted from [18]. Possible scores for each sDSA ranged from 4 to 20. sDSA Synthetic digital subtraction angiography