Skip to main content

Table 3 Diagnostic performance of the three prediction models in training and testing set

From: Development of a combined radiomics and CT feature-based model for differentiating malignant from benign subcentimeter solid pulmonary nodules

Group

Model

AUC (95% CI)

Accuracy

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

Training set

Clinical model

0.920 (0.885–0.956)

0.850

0.800

0.897

0.880

0.825

Radiomics model

0.907 (0.875–0.938)

0.824

0.861

0.789

0.795

0.856

Combined model

0.942 (0.918–0.966)

0.870

0.880

0.861

0.858

0.883

Testing set

Clinical model

0.835 (0.758–0.912)

0.745

0.604

0.880

0.829

0.698

Radiomics model

0.900 (0.867–0.932)

0.815

0.848

0.783

0.788

0.844

Combined model

0.930 (0.902–0.957)

0.858

0.867

0.849

0.846

0.870

  1. AUC Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, CI Confidence interval, NPV Negative predictive value, PPV Positive predictive value