From: Development and assessment of a telesonography system for musculoskeletal imaging
Robotic, n (%) | Conventional, n (%) | p* | |
---|---|---|---|
Patient communication | – | ||
Very good | 5 (100) | 5 (100) | |
Good | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Neutral | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Poor | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Very poor | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Image quality | – | ||
Very good | 5 (100) | 5 (100) | |
Good | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Neutral | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Poor | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Very poor | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Ergonomics | 0.444 | ||
Very good | 3 (60) | 5 (100) | |
Good | 2 (40) | 0 (0) | |
Neutral | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Poor | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Very poor | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Convenience | 0.444 | ||
Very good | 3 (60) | 5 (100) | |
Good | 2 (40) | 0 (0) | |
Neutral | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Poor | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Very poor | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |