Skip to main content

Table 2 Diagnostic accuracy of group method of data handling models to discriminate tumour differentiation grade in volumes from different segmentation techniques

From: Multiparametric quantitative and texture 18F-FDG PET/CT analysis for primary malignant tumour grade differentiation

Tumour differentiation grade

Segmentation techniques

SUVmax 2.5

Liver pool

41% SUVmax

ITK-SNAP

Model value (sensitivity %/specificity %/overall accuracy %)

 1

78.6/100.0/82.4

100.0/100.0/100.0

83.3/100.0/86.7

100.0/100.0/100.0

 2

66.7/75.0/70.6

90.9/100.0/93.8

87.5/85.7/86.7

83.3/100.0/93.8

 3

81.8/66.7/76.5

71.4/88.9/81.3

90.0/80.0/86.7

80.0/100.0/90.6

Model value (C-statistic/root mean square error/F-measure)

 1

0.818/0.457/0.778

0.989/0.244/0.943

0.961/0.288/0.921

0.976/0.244/0.946

 2

0.672/0.606/0.618

0.928/0.349/0.875

0.940/0.335/0.887

0.975/0.233/0.988

 3

0.672/0.679/0.540

0.967/0.321/0.892

0.955/0.301/0.901

0.944/0.216/0.991

  1. SUV Standardised uptake value