Skip to main content

Table 2 Low-dose peak acquisition simulation as compared to ideal peak acquisition

From: Timing optimization of low-dose first-pass analysis dynamic CT myocardial perfusion measurement: validation in a swine model

Protocol (n = 98)

Cardiac cycle difference from peak (beats, mean)

p value (comparison with the ideal peak)

RMSE (beats)

\( \frac{{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{i}}}{2} \)+ 0.5 s

-0.56 ± 1.79

0.004

1.87

\( \frac{{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{i}}}{2} \) + 1.0 s

0.13 ± 1.85

0.497

1.84

\( \frac{{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{i}}}{2} \) + 1.5 s

0.86 ± 1.97

0.000

2.14

  1. n number of measurements made in the 28 animals, \( \frac{T_i}{2} \) one half of the contrast injection time in seconds, RMSE root-mean-square error