Skip to main content

Table 3 Detailed quality assessment

From: Photon-counting CT of elbow joint fractures: image quality in a simulated post-trauma setting with off-center positioning

 

Fracture assessment

rating value (mean [min−max])

Trabecular bone assessment rating value (mean [min−max]

Kernel

Position

Dose protocol

PCD-CT

EID-CT

p value

PCD-CT

EID-CT

p value

Br76/Ur77

OH

2 mGy

4.0 [4−4]

3.5 [3−4]

0.002

4.0 [4−4]

1.3 [1−2]a

< 0.001

6 mGy

6.5 [6−7]

3.8 [3−4]

< 0.001

6.0 [6−6]

3.3 [3−4]

< 0.001

12 mGy

7.0 [7−7]

4.6 [4−5]

< 0.001

6.5 [6−7]

3.8 [3−4]

< 0.001

ABD

2 mGy

2.5 [2−3]

1.0 [1−1]b

< 0.001

2.5 [2−3]

1.0 [1−1]b

< 0.001

6 mGy

3.2 [3−4]

1.9 [1−2]a

< 0.001

3.2 [3−4]

1.2 [1−2]a

< 0.001

12 mGy

6.4 [6−7]

3.7 [3−4]

< 0.001

5.6 [5−6]

1.8 [1−2]a

< 0.001

Br89/Ur89

OH

2 mGy

2.3 [2−3]

1.0 [1−1]b

< 0.001

1.0 [1−1]b

1.0 [1−1]b

1.0

6 mGy

4.3 [4−5]

1.0 [1−1]b

< 0.001

5.0 [5−5]

1.0 [1−1]b

< 0.001

12 mGy

7.0 [7−7]

2.7 [2−3]

< 0.001

6.7 [6−7]

1.2 [1−2]a

< 0.001

ABD

2 mGy

2.0 [2−2]

1.0 [1−1]b

< 0.001

1.0 [1−1]b

1.0 [1−1]b

1.0

6 mGy

2.3 [2−3]

1.0 [1−1]b

< 0.001

1.7 [1−2]a

1.0 [1−1]b

< 0.001

12 mGy

6.5 [6−7]

1.0 [1−1]b

< 0.001

5.8 [5−6]

1.0 [1−1]b

< 0.001

  1. Quality assessment by two readers for 10 cadaveric specimens (mean value, min−max) for fracture and trabecular bone on a 7-point rating scale. The subjective evaluation was better for PCD-CT compared to EID-CT for almost all scan protocols. The p value of the Wilcoxon signed rank test analysis is reported
  2. aRating scale value: 1 (nondiagnostic), 2 (very poor)
  3. bRating scale value: 1 (nondiagnostic). ABD Abdominal scanning position, EID-CT Energy-integrating detector computed tomography, OH Overhead scanning position, PCD-CT Photon-counting detector computed tomography