Skip to main content

Table 2 Signal-to-noise ratios in kiwifruits examined with and without an endorectal coil at site 1 (twelve corresponding regions of interest in anterior and posterior locations) and at site 2 (three corresponding regions of interest in anterior and posterior locations)

From: Two-centre comparative experimental study of biparametric MRI at 3.0 T with and without endorectal coil using kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) as a phantom for human prostate

Kiwifruits, outer pericarp, site 1

ERC, n = 12 × 2 ROIs

noERC, n = 12 × 2 ROIs

ERC versus noERC

SNR, anterior (mean ± SD)

SNR, posterior (mean ± SD)

p value

SNR, anterior (mean ± SD)

SNR, posterior (mean ± SD

p value

SNR, anterior,p value

SNR, posterior,p value

T2WI

14.2 ± 2.4

13.9 ± 3.7

0.742

13.3 ± 2.4

13.1 ± 2.7

0.763

0.428

0.546

DWIreduced b = 50

4.8 ± 2.4

7.8 ± 2.7

0.013

7.4 ± 4.0

8.2 ± 2.4

0.541

0.005

0.688

DWIreduced b = 800

7.6 ± 7.1

7.3 ± 2.8

0.894

7.0 ± 3.2

10.7 ± 4.7

0.044

0.736

0.047

DWIreduced ADC

5.3 ± 2.2

21.9 ± 12.0

< 0.001

10.5 ± 5.5

34.1 ± 13.3

< 0.001

0.002

0.024

Kiwifruits, outer pericarp, site 2

ERC, n = 3 × 2 ROIs

noERC, n = 3 × 2 ROIs

ERC versus noERC

SNR, anterior (mean ± SD)

SNR, posterior (mean ± SD)

p value

SNR, anterior (mean ± SD)

SNR, posterior (mean ± SD

p value

SNR, anterior, p value

SNR, posterior, p value

T2WI

19.8 ± 5.1

17.4 ± 2.9

0.485

14.5 ± 6.8

18.5 ± 6.7

0.255

0.481

0.691

DWIreduced b = 50

8.8 ± 1.5

7.1 ± 1.4

0.421

6.6 ± 3.1

8.4 ± 1.5

0.173

0.463

0.178

DWIreduced b = 800

5.3 ± 4.2

8.2 ± 1.2

0.401

9.9 ± 0.5

7.8 ± 1.4

0.076

0.225

0.708

DWIreduced ADC

10.8 ± 3.0

41.7 ± 13.1

0.060

5.2 ± 0.6

26.7 ± 9.8

0.071

0.095

0.366

Kiwifruits, peripheral placenta, site 1

ERC, n = 12 × 2 ROIs

noERC, n = 12 × 2 ROIs

ERC versus noERC

SNR, anterior (mean ± SD)

SNR, posterior (mean ± SD)

p value

SNR, anterior (mean ± SD)

SNR, posterior (mean ± SD

p value

SNR, anterior, p value

SNR, posterior, p value

T2WI

9.4 ± 3.9

8.6 ± 2.6

0.251

7.8 ± 2.6

8.1 ± 2.9

0.715

0.285

0.496

DWIreduced b = 50

7.6 ± 4.3

6.1 ± 1.9

0.332

9.1 ± 2.8

9.1 ± 4.9

0.992

0.379

0.066

DWIreduced b = 800

7.8 ± 3.1

7.0 ± 3.1

0.581

10.5 ± 2.9

11.5 ± 6.2

0.529

0.046

0.086

DWIreduced ADC

15.1 ± 8.2

15.2 ± 8.6

0.941

26.7 ± 16.1

25.5 ± 9.2

0.810

0.036

0.010

Kiwifruits, peripheral placenta, site 2

ERC, n = 3 × 2 ROIs

noERC, n = 3 × 2 ROIs

ERC versus noERC

SNR, anterior (mean ± SD)

SNR, posterior (mean ± SD)

p value

SNR, anterior (mean ± SD)

SNR, posterior (mean ± SD)

p value

SNR, anterior, p value

SNR, posterior, p value

T2WI

9.0 ± 0.7

9.8 ± 3.5

0.713

9.0 ± 0.7

10.4 ± 2.9

0.391

0.972

0.225

DWIreduced b = 50

7.1 ± 2.0

6.8 ± 0.2

0.825

6.5 ± 1.8

8.7 ± 2.1

0.010

0.125

0.241

DWIreduced b = 800

7.2 ± 1.3

6.9 ± 2.2

0.861

8.6 ± 0.4

8.4 ± 1.6

0.806

0.183

0.450

DWIreduced ADC

24.7 ± 2.2

35.6 ± 14.0

0.277

22.5 ± 11.4

22.1 ± 4.3

0.937

0.729

0.251

  1. p values were obtained using Student’s t test for paired samples
  2. ADC apparent diffusion coefficient, DWIreduced echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging with reduced field of view and selective excitation, ERC with endorectal coil, noERC without endorectal coil, ROI region-of-interest, SD standard deviation, SNR signal-to-noise ratio, T2WI T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo imaging