Skip to main content

Table 2 Noise and CNR at different dose levels with FBP, HIR and MIR

From: Emphysema quantification using chest CT: influence of radiation dose reduction and reconstruction technique

 

Noise (aorta)

Noise (fat)

CNR

Routine dose

 FBP

37.5 (28.1–42.8)

30.2 (25.4–52.0)

4.8 (3.0–5.5)

 HIR

18.4 (15.0–22.2)a

18.2 (14.6–23.3)a

8.3 (6.7–10.1)a

 MIR

11.4 (9.5–12.5)a

11.5 (9.8–15.2)a

13.0 (10.7–15.9)a

45% reduced dose

 FBP

46.6 (38.9–58.4)a

39.3 (31.6–78.9)a

3.3 (2.1–4.5)a

 HIR

23.2 (20.5–26.5)a

23.5 (17.5–27.8)a

6.7 (5.5–8.1)a

 MIR

12.3 (11.3–14.4)a

13.5 (10.7–17.2)a

11.4 (9.0–13.7)a

60% reduced dose

 FBP

60.2 (47.8–81.4)a

50.8 (42.5–94.6)a

2.5 (1.7–3.5)a

 HIR

26.4 (22.9–31.8)a

28.1 (21.4–34.7)a

5.5 (4.4–6.8)a

 MIR

13.7 (12.2–16.5)a

13.9 (12.7–17.2)a

11.4 (8.9–12.4)a

75% reduced dose

 FBP

80.0 (61.4–108.5)a

62.8 (47.5–142.6)a

2.3 (1.2–2.7)a

 HIR

32.6 (28.5–37.8)

30.4 (24.7–39.6)

4.7 (3.7–5.7)

 MIR

16.4 (14.1–19.7)a

15.1 (13.8–19.1)a

9.2 (7.9–11.3)a

  1. Values are presented as median (interquartile range)
  2. aStatistically significant difference compared to FBP at routine dose with a Bonferroni corrected p value of 0.017
  3. CNR contrast-to-noise ratio, FBP filtered back projection, HIR hybrid iterative reconstruction, MIR model-based iterative reconstruction