Skip to main content

Table 5 Objective and subjective image quality per stent type

From: Computed tomography image quality of aortic stents in patients with aortic coarctation: a multicentre evaluation

 

Average stent diameter (mm)

Noise aorta (HU)

Noise muscle (HU)

Signal-to-noise ratio

Aorta

Signal-to-noise ratio

Muscle

Contrast to noise

Overall subjective image quality

Image quality aorta

Proximal score

Image quality aorta

Central score

Image quality aorta

Distal score

Paediatrics

 Cheatham Platinum (n = 18)

14±3

30±13

24±10

13±7

3±2

12±6

2.0±0.8

2.3±0.7

2.0±0.7

2.4±0.8

 Atrium Advanta V12 (n = 5)

11±3

28±16

23±8

13±2

3±1

11±3

3.4±0.9

3.6±0.5

3.6±0.5

3.6±0.5

 IntraStent (n = 4)

12±4

44±21

26±9

12±7

3±1

13±6

3.5±0.6

4.0±0.0

4.0±0.0

4.0±0.0

 AndraStent (n = 4)

17±3

32±17

32±23

15±6

3±1

14±7

3.8±0.5

3.8±0.5

3.8±0.5

3.8±0.5

 Formula (n = 3)

6±1

30±17

15±5

10±2

6±1

9±1

2.3±1.2

3.7±0.6

3.7±0.6

3.7±0.6

 Palmaz (n = 3)

15±1

29±16

28±13

17±11

3±1

14±8

4.0±0.0

4.0±0.0

4.0±0.0

4.0±0.0

Adults

 Cheatham Platinum (n = 34)

17±3

27±11

24±8

14±7

3±1

12±6

2.3±0.6

2.3±0.8

1.9±0.8

2.6±0.7

  1. Data are means ± standard deviations. HU Hounsfield unit