Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between breast cancer grading (high grade) and magnetic resonance imaging features

From: Radiologic-pathologic correlation in breast cancer: do MRI biomarkers correlate with pathologic features and molecular subtypes?

  

High grade

χ2 analysis

p-value

Univariate analysis

 

Multivariate analysis

 
    

OR (CI 95%)b

p-value

OR (CI 95%)b

p-value

No. of patients

 

73

     

Tumour size

Median (mm)

Range (mm)

52

34–75

     

 ≥ 2 cm

 

44/73

0.097

1.779 (0.899–3.518)

0.098

  

T2 intensity

Hypointensity

Isointensity

Hyperintensity

35/73

16/73

22/73

0.047a

1.842 (0.918–3.697)

0.399 (0.189–0.844)

1.267 (0.595–2.699)

0.086

0.016

0.539

0.385 (0.124–1.193)

0.098

Mass enhancement

 

55/73

0.921

1.040 (0.478–2.264)

0.921

  

Rim enhancement

 

25/55

0.002

4.062 (1.607–10.271)

0.003

3.689 (1.011–3.467)

0.048

Intralesional necrosis

 

33/73

0.028

2.232 (1.084–4.597)

0.029

0.651 (0.193–2.195)

0.489

Perilesional oedema

 

45/73

0.001

3.214 (1.588–6.505)

0.001

2.105 (0.729–6.078)

0.169

Axillary adenopathy

 

32/73

0.008

2.732 (1.287–5.799)

0.009

2.241 (0.769–6.536)

0.139

Intensity-to-time curve

Type I

Type II

Type III

2/73

21/73

50/73

0.245

0.268 (0.052–1.377)

1.093 (0.515–2.319)

1.250 (0.613–2.548)

0.115

0.817

0.539

  

ADC value

Very low

Low

Intermediate

41/60

18/60

1/60

0.036a

2.937 (1.385–6.228)

0.339 (0.159–0.723)

0.873 (0.053–14.29)

0.005

0.005

0.924

2.191 (0.806–5.951)

0.124

Extent of disease

Unifocal

Multifocal

Multicentric

29/73

27/73

17/73

0.011

0.494 (0.249–0.980)

3.522 (1.504–8.246)

0.759 (0.351–1.640)

0.044

0.004

0.483

2.247 (0.771–6.548)

0.138

  1. aBonferroni’s post hoc analysis found no significance. bOR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval,  ADC Apparent diffusion coefficient